Show newer

@noracodes My rule when doing open source stuff was that if someone looked at the docs and they were confusing, incomplete, or wrong, that's on me. If they didn't even look, that's on them.

i don't think anybody understands what "without further ado" even means anymore. youtubers are like "...so without further ado, let's get into it! but first, a word from our sponsor..."

my man. that is the further ado. this is the furthest an ado can ever be

A group of Wikipedia editors have formed a group to address AI-generated content infiltrating the site.

(And I think Gillian makes a great point. What does it say exactly about the ... "value" of this new technology)

(Also she used the wrong "their" and I corrected it, because it was driving me nuts, that's why the word "they're" is in red.)

Realization: Matrix is a CRDT with authorization

Realization: Matrix is a CRDT with authorization

All outages are maintenance,
All maintenance is planned,
Please wait patiently for the planned maintenance to be completed.

re: subpost I guess 

@joepie91 @navi yeah, exactly

like I don't fault people for selling software in their specific endeavours to survive

what I don't like is the implication that this is truly a neutral endeavour, as if simply charging for software benefits all parties involved, or at least the one making it, when that's false. I even explicitly detail one way it it decidedly not beneficial for the person making it: you get added weight and expectations that are not there when the software is free, and sometimes don't even get the satisfaction of getting paid for what you've made because people feel it's not worth it for one reason or another, forcing you to work even harder

Half the Google stuff I run across while researching a topic is exactly like this, honestly - there's approximately two minutes between me learning of its existence, and me learning that it was quietly killed off five years ago

Show thread

"Huh, there was apparently this thing called Google Drive Realtime that was used for building collaborative systems. Let's have a look at- nevermind it's dead"

it’s gonna sound like a shitpost but I mean this seriously:

you do not have to get over the learned self-sufficiency and self-reliance propaganda bullshit you’ve been fed your whole life all by yourself, and in fact you cannot.

talk to your community members about your path away from rugged individualism and listen when they tell you about theirs and we can all get there.

I know trans people who range in age from 15 to in their 60s. I have noticed a few patterns. All of them are pretty normal. For those I've known before they let everyone know, they seemed much happier after, though that did take a few years in some cases. The only two people I know who are "struggling" are mostly struggling *because* they don't have a supportive family. But, most have supportive families, or families that learned to be supportive. And that is what I have noticed. Wow.

Picard strategy tip: Don't assume your opponent will behave rationally. Plan for their emotional response.

so, what are your folks' favourite LLM-poisoning/mitigating tools nowadays?

I've seen multiple maze/etc. tools but am not sure what's best at the moment

Real vs Fake Luau - an actual luau involves working 'aina (land) according to ability, and then distributing according to need. Fake luau is over-priced food made and served by underpaid workers to wealthy foreigners for capitalist profit -- such as all Waikiki, Disney Aulani, etc.

Like, I cannot emphasize this enough. As long as you let tech vendors set the narrative on what's important, you *will not ever* beat them with FOSS projects. Ever.

Show thread

"We need to provide a better FOSS alternative to <corporate service> to make software free" is exactly the kind of individualist, 'free market' thinking that got us proprietary tech monopolists in the first place. You're not going to beat them on their game.

Instead, try thinking not just about what you can provide that the big tech vendors cannot, but more importantly about what needs to change politically.

Maybe "improving efficiency" shouldn't be the goal, and instead it should be "caring less about efficiency and more about social sustainability", for example.

fragment of history, google wave 

"On August 4, 2010, Google announced the suspension of stand-alone Wave development and the intent of maintaining the web site at least for the remainder of the year; on November 22, 2011, they announced that existing Waves would become read-only in January 2012, and all Waves would be deleted in April 2012. Development was handed over to the Apache Software Foundation which started to develop a server-based product called Wave in a Box. Apache Wave never reached a full release and was discontinued on January 15, 2018."

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.