I have been accepted for a talk at #fluconf
My presentation is called "Improving Diversity and Inclusion in the Open Source Community" and you can see the presentation slides here:
1/3
meta, ableism, elaborating on my fediblock post
So I want to provide some elaboration on this fediblock post I made: https://blackqueer.life/@tillshadeisgone/113891510610086508
I want to remind you all of a selection from of my pinned post on conflict with comrades, which I believe is relevant here.
So, I have been rethinking how I interact with this space going forward to better protect myself but also to have a more robust and intentional framework for how to engage with conflicts. I've been learning about how revolutionaries in the past have handled conflict with each other while maintaining unity in their movement. Many of these practices existed within local orgs and communities, and therefore are not necessarily applicable or appropriate for a digital and public space like this. However, I think some lessons can still be taken. So, in light of that, HERE IS MY PROPOSAL: If I am engaging with you and I believe that while we are aligned in our goals for liberation, you are inadvertently causing harm with your words, I may ask you to self-crit. This is not an attack, but is an invitation to reconsider what you are saying. This will also mean that I am available to you, privately or publicly, to explain my thinking and have a dialogue about our disagreement.
This policy is what I was drawing on when I engaged with the user I made a fediblock post about. As mentioned in my fediblock post, I chose to reach out privately to mention my concern and be able to explain my thinking in the hopes that I would be heard. This was a couple of days ago.
The thing is, just as I mentioned in said pinned post that antiblackess destroys unity, ableism destroys unity too. Black disabled folks have been saying for YEARS on this and every other digital platform that they feel excluded from just about every single community space, on the left or otherwise. This is not new information by any means.
Therefore, ESPECIALLY given that as our server's About section points out, 1 in 4 Black American adults are disabled, it is my responsibility as the admin of BQL to make sure that our space does not reproduce that same dynamic. If I want Black disabled people to feel like they can be in our community, I cannot allow ableism in our community. Full stop.
As I feel like I keep repeating, this is something I take very seriously. And sometimes, despite my best efforts, attempts to convince people that they are doing harm are not going to be successful. That is what happened in this case. The person did not listen to me or anyone else who tried to convince her, including Black disabled people who were impacted by her words. She continued, over the course of the past two or three days, to double down, saying that racism is a mental illness. Then, she started defending using the R slur and blaming disabled people for Trump being elected, explicitly referencing alleged decreases in average IQ scores.
When someone is repeatedly insistent on echoing eugenics ideology and Nazi talking points about intelligence, that is several steps past what is acceptable. To steal some language I got from communists, the contradiction between her deeply held beliefs and the presence and value of my disabled users was clearly antagonistic and not resolvable through dialogue.
Sometimes, you have to do the hard thing. It wasn't pleasant, but guess what? That's the job. Do you think it was pleasant for me to suspend instances like tech.lgbt or aus.social where we had a lot of connections, cutting our users off from theirs? To make public posts about it before and after? No, it was extremely stressful and upsetting and brought a lot more harassment my way. But I did it anyway. Wasn't the first time, won't be the last.
Oh, and it is worth mentioning that I have been accused of catering to the "white political gaze" by making my fediblock post, implying that I am doing so for the optics and because I care about getting accolades from white people more than I care about my fellow Black folks. It has been implied that this is all theater, and has no connection to any real beliefs on my part. To that, all I can say is that ableism is a bigger danger to Black folks than ableism is to white people. White supremacy is inextricably tied to ableism, and I have referenced and boosted multiple works by Black disabled advocates and academics in the past two days who discuss that exact concept. In short, disability justice is not just for fucking white people.
To close, I just want to restate that at the end of the day, ableism is a violation of rule #1 on BQL. Anyone who doesn't agree with the existence of that rule or who doesn't like it when we enforce it is no comrade of mine.
Thanks for reading.
Edit: clarity.
Ik had dit als losse gedachte en nu wil ik het. Europese providers: mogen we opslag bij jullie en in-browser officepakketten? Dan krijgen jullie geld van me en zal ik het nooit meer hebben over dat gedoe met de datakabel in onze straat. Beloofd. https://mastodon.nl/@venite/113899795924795606
Even if you think you’re the exception and you will never become chronically ill, wear a mask.
Even if you’re “young and otherwise healthy”, wear a mask.
Even if your last covid infection was “mild”, wear a mask.
Do it for those who may not be as lucky, and do it to protect your long term health
#covidisairborne #covidisnotover #longcovid #chronicillness #disability
rant
CW-boost: "AI"
poisoning AI by disregarding disabled people
just posting this on its own since it probably got lost already, as a comment on a different thread:
basically every method of "poisoning" AIs by messing with content in "unnoticeable" ways for all clients, will make your content less accessible.
trying to analyse network traffic and put AI scrapers into mazes is fine and won't affect most people. adding hidden text "off screen" has a very high chance of affecting screen readers and other accessibility aids, while not affecting AI scrapers.
one key example is where people have proposed to modify subtitles in videos to add lots of garbage that is "invisible" or "off screen", similar to the age-old trick of having white text in the background of a PDF that gets picked up by résumé scanners. the solution that all of these tools have chosen is to just render the document and OCR the text, meaning that the bad actors continue as usual, but the good actors get messed up as their screen reader lists out all sorts of nonsense, and everyone suffers as the scanners fail to properly OCR text that isn't perfect Times New Roman Eleven Point Font.
for videos, people have argued that blind people can listen to the unmodified audio track, whereas deaf people can read the subtitles which are only showing what's on the screen. this excludes deaf-blind people who are forced to read the transcript with a braille reader: they will get the nonsense you put in the subtitles. or, just anyone who wants to read the transcript for any other reason.
it really is admirable for people to try and "poison" AI data, but unless you do so in a way that is tailored to the clients doing the scraping (network traffic), you are going to just fuck over people who need your accessibility data. please don't
transphobia
You know what I "love"?
When people who were previously openly bigoted towards me feel a shift in attitudes and start appealing to my humanity or sense of community or empathy or good political sense without owning up to, or even acknowledging, their past wrongdoing.
Pretending to be the "bigger man" when no longer allowed to be shitty has got to be amongst the most disgusting tactics out there.
LLMs, article link, someone's personal vent that contains slurs
Sharing this in the hope that it can help to get the point through to some LLM fanatics: https://ludic.mataroa.blog/blog/i-will-fucking-piledrive-you-if-you-mention-ai-again/
Note that it contains slurs that are ableist or antisemitic in origin, although I do not think that was the intention behind their use here.
there really needs to be a kind of nix that can run reasonably well on lower-power devices like the librem 5. plasma mobile is barely able to keep running while the nix config is being eval'd (and no, this isn't even the build yet, the eval part alone takes nearly 9 minutes and is enough to make this device struggle)
The first step of creating a #wheelchair model that isn't a total disgrace is to not forget about the human.
Step zero might be having friends in wheelchairs or having seen actual wheelchairs.
(if you want to know why this trot seems a bit salty, look for wheelchairs on sketchfab ...)
Feel free to give feedback if you use wheelchairs.
#3dart #blender #modeling
computer, linux help,
hi, I have a "server" that's occasionally completely freezing in correlation with LVM snapshots
Update: 2025-03-07 update has some more actually useful info, including the fact that lvremove on a snapshot followed by a freeze. and it somehow happened when i did a manual trigger backup
note: i have much more up to date information on my wiki. short link is https://w.jc6.xyz/9 because the long link is https://wiki.jacksonchen666.com/wiki/Request_for_help:Random_system_freezes_on_backups_with_LVM_snapshots :p
please check my wiki for complete information. below is kind of a summary version that's not complete.
i make LVM snapshots on backups, then remove them after it's done. it seems the last syslogs i usually get is a log that the backup is starting, then logs stop there. interestingly, a backup at the time is made and appears to be complete. after i restart the system, the next backup will be empty, then the second next backup will be normal (my script removes snapshots, and doesn't error on existing snapshot name when creating a snapshot)
i don't have logs of what my backups do, unfortunately. currently system logs are sent via network including kernel and syslogs
when it freezes, SSH is impossible and pressing keys on a keyboard does nothing (except for tty 7-8, which might use a different tty program), but the tty cursor still blinks, and system still responds to sysrq. but sysrq actions which dumps info doesn't really dump any info, and I can only reboot from there.
the system also seems to be idle when it freezes, given it's slightly colder?
running alpine linux 3.21.2, kernel 6.12.9-0-lts, lvm 2.03.29-r1 (distro package) (also all might be slightly outdated by now), feel free to ask any info I might've missed
saying “LLMs have their uses” is like saying “Agent Orange has its uses” - technically correct. more correct than LLMs often are, even, but folks, I hate to break it to you: “technically correct” is not actually the best kind of correct except in a very very narrow set of circumstances that you’ll rarely find yourself in. “technically correct” is just another version of the Torment Nexus.
I wrote a CDC Archive Archiver to pull public information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. Just in case people get weird ideas of removing science from the public discourse. This is part of a larger effort that, among others, @lavaeolus initiated. You are welcome to chime in if that's up your alley.
- https://codeberg.org/antifascistDH/academia-preserver/src/branch/main/cdc_archiver
- https://fedihum.org/@lavaeolus/113882207119609662
- https://codeberg.org/thgie/antifascist-archives-action-sticker
Something I've been noticing lately, in a lot of different places, is that as economic conditions get worse, things start getting stolen more often.
I'm not talking about shoplifting here; I'm talking about people stealing from their own communities. I've noticed increased reports of this in a wide variety of communities, across countries.
Please be mindful of who you are stealing from, and don't let it be your community. And conversely, if you are still doing well financially, look for people in your community who are financially drowning and how you can help them.
actionable, AI
Massive tech companies have invested absurd amounts of money into "AI" systems, recentering their whole business around it.
It seems to me that one of the most effective ways to hurt these tech companies, would be to sabotage their play by making "AI" as socially unacceptable as possible, so that their investments turn into useless bricks that nobody wants or trusts.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.