I keep having discussions with a coworker about securing encryption keys where I refer to it as "the Frog and Toad problem", and I feel like this _should_ be the term of art that's used everywhere to talk about secret management.
Today: our Jenkins server stores an SSH private key encrypted with a passphrase. In order to automatically run the jobs that use it, Jenkins... needs to store the passphrase. So is it buying us any security at all to have it? We can cut the string and open the box.
activism(?) meta, "you", potentially hot take
Yes, lots of people are wrong about lots of things. Lots of people are ignorant about lots of things. You can keep complaining about this until you're blue in the face and it will change exactly nothing.
Venting to friends, other activists, etc. is fine, given that the listener is okay with it, don't get me wrong. But telling people that they are wrong does not, *in and of itself*, change anything about them being wrong!
If you want people to stop being wrong and ignorant, you need to find an actual way to fix that problem. Sometimes that's going to mean confrontational conversations.
Usually, though, it means working around biases, preconceived notions, and mental defenses. Often by doing things that "shouldn't be necessary" like provisionally agreeing with something or hearing out their views and motivations (that you've heard a thousand times before), even just to put someone at ease.
And yes, it *shouldn't* be necessary, but often it is. And are you just venting, or do you actually want the problem to be fixed?
Did you know: JCDecaux and Clear Channel are advertising companies, not infrastructure companies.
The reason you see them everywhere is because they have contracts with many municipalities; they pay for and maintain city infrastructure (bus stops, trash bins, benches, etc.) and in exchange they get exclusive advertising rights in many locations. They operate throughout Europe, and probably elsewhere.
These contracts typically come with steep cancellation fines, and are a major reason why political efforts to ban advertising in public spaces often goes nowhere; if the local government were to go through with that, they would immediately have a large cancellation fine and infrastructure bill to pay.
Often, (part of) these contracts are publicly available; consult the public infrastructure agreements and documents for your local government, and do a FOIA or equivalent request if necessary. This should tell you exactly how they are keeping your local government under their thumb.
It's possible to start a business, including a technology business, without it being a #Startup . A Startup is a specific kind of business, one in which the goal of the founders is to raise a ton of cash early on in hopes of making a *huge* product down the road.
It's tied to investor and #VentureCapital culture.
It's possible to run a small business where the goal isn't being acquired or creating a monopoly.
LB about how Linux missionaries berating people for not knowing terminal aren't helping their "just use Linux it has a GUI" cause:
Ah, so that's why people onhere who proselytize about the fediverse and "don't understand why more people don't use it" are so shitty about constantly "suggesting" that people should spin up their own instances the second they experience anything unpleasant here. They are just used to being judgy condescending technoelitist shitnuggets.
Degrowth is an incredibly threatening idea to capitalists -esp. to some in certain industries.
There's gonna be lots more disinfo and distortions about it.
Degrowth targets -excesses- that are harmful (mega yachts, bombs, commutes- stuff we don't need to live well), not reductions to basic well being.
Comments declaring we'll need to live in caves, or that reductions in population are necessary first steps …yeah, ya might want to investigate whether they are paid shills or just ignorant.
vague meta grumbling (2)
Clarification: "racism", "fascism", etc. are obviously not "marginal differences in personal views" and are not what I'm talking about here.
One would hope that that's obvious, but I'm adding this to make sure that the Usual Suspects don't try to use this post as ammo to try and shut up criticism. Which I'm not arguing for anyway, by the way, genuine criticism is fine.
vague meta grumbling
With how much bullshit and abuse queer communities already have to endure from fascists and the like, it would be nice if those queer communities made a bit more of an effort to constructively resolve conflicts between said communities, instead of trying to eat each other for marginal differences in personal views.
Like, sure, you don't have to interact with people you don't like, and this isn't an argument against eg. fediblocking, but the amount of abuse I sometimes see flying from communities trying to 'defend' themselves from something that isn't actually a threat, is concerning.
Please *talk to* people first and understand why they do what they do, instead of making assumptions about them and mounting entire campaigns based on that.
(This is almost certainly not about whatever conflict you may be thinking of, but it probably does apply there too. I'm being deliberately vague here because there's no point in calling out a specific case.)
I don't think I agree with the idea that time spent automating a task only "pays off" if it saves you a significant amount of time on an ongoing basis. Yesterday I automated the sending of a monthly email that probably takes me less than a minute to send. Even if it took me five minutes I would not recoup the time spent automating it for over a year.
But - I feel lighter. Now I don't have to remember to do it, and I don't have the nuisance of a boring repetitive task to deal with every month.
What the actual fuck?
This is some wild investigative reporting from IGN.
Did you know: JCDecaux and Clear Channel are advertising companies, not infrastructure companies.
The reason you see them everywhere is because they have contracts with many municipalities; they pay for and maintain city infrastructure (bus stops, trash bins, benches, etc.) and in exchange they get exclusive advertising rights in many locations. They operate throughout Europe, and probably elsewhere.
These contracts typically come with steep cancellation fines, and are a major reason why political efforts to ban advertising in public spaces often goes nowhere; if the local government were to go through with that, they would immediately have a large cancellation fine and infrastructure bill to pay.
Often, (part of) these contracts are publicly available; consult the public infrastructure agreements and documents for your local government, and do a FOIA or equivalent request if necessary. This should tell you exactly how they are keeping your local government under their thumb.
Something that just occurred to me: a lot of people identify with and cheer on the protagonist in movies who knowingly takes a difficult decision at great cost to themselves or even others, a potentially destructive or violent one, which they know must be taken for the greater good.
And yet, many of these same people will immediately condemn radical direct actions undertaken by activists under exactly these circumstances, where they only see the outcome and not the process of careful deliberation and consideration that went into it.
(Yes I know that sometimes, some other emulators work under some configurations for some games. The point here is that Goldberg works *consistently*.)
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
Feel free to flirt, but if you want to actually meet up and/or do something with me, lewd or otherwise, please tell me explicitly or I won't realize :) I'm generally very open to that sort of thing!
Further boundaries: boosts are OK (including for lewd posts), DMs are open. But the devil doesn't need an advocate; I'm not interested in combative arguing in my mentions. I am however happy to explain things in-depth when asked non-combatively.
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.