Show newer

@noracodes

Ideological purity over user interests? ✅️
No understanding of why that ideology matters? ✅️
Enforcement of said ideology through pseudolegal rules that reward toxic dudebro behavior? ✅️

Yep, it's a GNU project.

: for those whose first computer experiences were with Windows 95/98 (or NT) and who look back on it fondly:

What would be needed to rekindle that early experience of wonder around computers and/or the internet? What stands out in your memory as the cause for that sense of wonder back then? (The answer to these two questions can be different!) :boost_requested:

If you write email subjects like you write fedi subjects, it's way easier to write emails actually

pandemic rhetoric 

you really do have to wonder if the whole general idea of "strengthening your immune system" came out of the same toxic rhetoric that encourages toxic masculinity and nationalism, where you have to be stronger in its own right for no particular reason, and not just because of bad science

like, it seems pretty indisputable that, while it's pretty difficult to avoid all germs and you actually should not do that, exposure to the kinds of germs that make you sick is pretty much always worse than not

we have vaccines to get immunity now and getting sick "naturally" just opens you up to being miserable or worse, permanent damage, so, seems pretty bad

there are a lot of toxic men who feel like they can "tough out" an infection and that's simply not true. you can't fight a cold like you fight a bear, and like fighting a bear, you can easily just die

idk. feels like we need to particularly hone in on this rhetoric as being toxic, fascist nonsense instead of it being anything like fact

I just want my friends to understand that if you message me a link to a YouTube video there is less than a 5% chance I will watch it. I’m sorry.

After hearing about Eric Schmidt's guest lecture in an AI class, I looked up the transcript, and yes he really did say that if a Silicon Valley entrepreneur were to "illegally steal everybody's music" they would just "hire a whole bunch of lawyers to go clean the mess up." Then I was curious and looked up the syllabus for the course and based on the topic schedule, the most explicit ethics topic seemed to be "opportunities and risks" for which the guest speaker was... Eric Schmidt. 😕

“What we sacrifice for automation”

fastcompany.com/90336550/how-m

> If we don’t do it the way the machine is designed to process it, we yield our agency, over and over again to do it in a way that it can collect the data to get us the item we want, the service we need, or the reply we hope for. Humans yield. Machines do not yield back.

"Should we privatize this thing?"

And

"Should we give control over this thing to an unelected rich person who has no reason to act in the public good?"

Are exactly the same question

This guy at the Boxhagener Platz flea market is doing top quality #carryshitolympics 🙂

Also feels like this maps neatly onto "precision" in other disciplines (3D modelling, manufacturing, etc.) where working at higher precision gets you a more exact result but usually at increased cost elsewhere

Show thread

Note that this is a philosophical classification much more than a technical one; many technical choices feed into how a language behaves, and the *intention* and underlying belief system of the designers are going to be the main determining factor here

Show thread

Pondering whether it would make sense to classify programming languages on a "precision" axis, meaning where it sits on the axis of tradeoffs between "exactly (needing to) specify all the details of what you want it to do, resulting in guaranteed and predictable behaviours" and "doing hopefully-the-right-thing with little specification work, at the cost of less predictable behaviour and it sometimes guessing wrong"

"Police interactions are people's first engagement with the prison system. Police can be in any public setting. They're on the street. They're in hospitals, libraries, train stations. They're in our schools. They're in our workplaces. They enter our homes - sometimes when summoned, sometimes by force, with or without a warrant. As K's experience illustrates, police bring the threat, and often the reality, of harassment, surveillance, criminalization, arrest and even death. Patrolling protests - including protests against the police - is part of their job. Police ensure that, particularly for marginalized people, there's always a possible path from everyday life to prison."

— Maya Schenwar, Victoria Law, Michelle Alexander: Prison by Any Other Name, p. 144

Being detained three separate times in my life (one for shoplifting, once for fare evasion and another for protest activity), this whole chapter, especially being based in New York City, is really getting hard to read, but I feel seen in a way I wasn't expecting.

TIL you can view every issue/PR on the entirety of GitHub

we have to kill capitalism so the internet can be good again

meta, communication styles 

I've noticed that the (autistic?) practice of "repeat in different words what was said to explicitly acknowledge it and incrementally add onto it at the same time" often gets interpreted as "mansplaining" on here and I'm not sure what to do about that

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.