subtoot, political
I should probably clarify: "here" means my geographical location, the Netherlands. Although I've seen similar behaviour on fedi as well, it's not what I'm currently referring to!
politiek, anarchisme, wat positiever
En als je hier wel aan bijdraagt of bij wilt dragen, en je zoekt anderen om actief aan een betere maatschappij te bouwen (dus: niet alleen maar klagen, maar ook doen), dan hoor ik graag van je!
politiek, anarchisme
En als je dit leest als anarchist in Nederland, en je bent hier nog niet actief mee bezig, ja, dan heb ik het ook over jou.
Dit is iets waar je allemaal aan bijdraagt. Solidariteit heet dat toch?
politiek, anarchisme
Als we er nou eens een gewoonte van maken om over de toegankelijkheid en (corona-)veiligheid van evenementen na te denken en dat duidelijk te vermelden, en we eindelijk eens wat gaan doen aan de wittemannencultuur, en als het even kan wat meer in "wij" te denken dan in "jij", dan wordt het misschien nog eens wat met de anarchistische beweging hier.
If someone from the museum community wants to come to Mastodon, what‘s the best instance to join?
#digitalmuseums #culturalheritage #mastodon #opendata #openaccess 🐘
uspol; Harris polls
Those who followed me back when I was like, "These polls are doom for Biden and he's losing the election" may be interested in my current analysis now that it's Harris' campaign instead.
Just like with Biden, I'm basing a great deal of "who is winning" off of state polls, since elections are won state by state and the popular vote basically doesn't matter.
So you focus on swing state polls to get a good idea of who wins or not.
https://www.270towin.com/2024-presidential-election-polls/
The map for Democrats is basically the same as it was when Biden was President. The Republicans have an easy path to 270, if they lock up Georgia and Pennsylvania, it's over. In fact, just locking up Pennsylvania alone puts them at 270 votes. It's 19 electoral votes, and we've already "penciled in" 251 votes for the Republicans at this point.
So Pennsylvania is a must win.
Biden was losing that state by 5-7 points.
Harris is now winning it by 2-3% points, especially when third parties are included.
The "must win" states for Democrats primarily amount to Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.
Those three states should net them a win.
Right now, Harris is comfortably polling ahead in all three.
Towards the end of his campaign, Biden was behind (or barely tied) in those same three states.
Other pickups like Georgia, and Arizona also look competitive, which was increasingly pulling out of range for Biden.
So yes, Biden dumping his campaign and Harris taking over was, in fact, the right move, and the only thing that could have saved the election for Democrats.
I hope some of you worrywart ninnies will reflect on this the next time you want to turn into Super Pundit and predict disaster when based on polling at the time, disaster was already a fait accompli.
whenever i play basically any open world game i think about how tiny their towns are, like a town of less than ten buildings and i'm like that's not a real society, there are so many buildings in a city. and i kind of want to know how small a comfortably self-sufficient social unit CAN be. like i guess subsistence farming is a thing but what do societies look like that are a step up in scale from The Humble Yeoman Farmer
Stumbled upon an excellent resource on Google Sites: "Why our family is covid cautious"
https://sites.google.com/view/why-we-are-covid-cautious/home
#covid #covid19 #SARSCoV2 #pandemic #PublicHealth #CovidIsNotOver
"So if you are a family member of ours that has been critical of our cautiousness, rest assured that we will willingly relax our precautions if you can provide evidence that we should. Hurry up."
🏆
Scientists worry that admitting science is political means that the public will not trust science.
But just because something is political doesn’t mean that you can’t trust it.
We can build trust in science through accountability, transparency, and accessible communication.
This is like the second- or third-pettiest take I have about AI, I'll warrant, but can we just collectively and as a society fuck right off with the idea of "open source AI"? The ideas of "source" and "binaries" don't neatly map onto LLM weights, but to the extent that they do, weights look a lot more like binaries than anything else.
At the very least, open source should in principle be reproducible, but without training data, there's no hope of reproducing LLM weights.
"10 years of Dear ImGui" by @ocornut is great. And a lot of great wisdom that is generally applicable outside of imgui. https://github.com/ocornut/imgui/issues/7892
nationalization
lotta comments like “but amazon dot us dot gov is a bad idea”
yeah. it is. and that’s not what i’m suggesting. but you think it is, because “nationalize” implies seizure by a westphalian nation-state characterized by regressive constructs like borders and state diktat. you read me wrong because english itself is barbaric, full of awful thorny words that could mean something worthy if not for the rivers of blood they’ve been steeped in.
nationalization
i’ve been reading a lot about plurinationalism, and indigenous restoration through communalism — a sort of “communism of the americas” chiefly bent on transforming a neocolonial basis — but i’m left hurting for words. nation means the wrong things; state means the wrong things; even community approaches mere taxonomy. so you misunderstand me, because there is no simple way to impart faith in utopia.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
Feel free to flirt, but if you want to actually meet up and/or do something with me, lewd or otherwise, please tell me explicitly or I won't realize :) I'm generally very open to that sort of thing!
Further boundaries: boosts are OK (including for lewd posts), DMs are open. But the devil doesn't need an advocate; I'm not interested in combative arguing in my mentions. I am however happy to explain things in-depth when asked non-combatively.
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.