Show newer

The survey also found that remote workers were 23 percent more likely to say they have "a psychologically and emotionally healthy workplace," 19 percent were more likely to cite "high levels of cooperation," and 18 percent were more likely to say that people avoid office politics and backstabbing.

#RemoteWork

arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20

Tangentially, I feel like there's a pretty strong correlation between "arguing that the standard library of a language should be extensive" and the problem of "popular things are often those that superficially sound like they have a lot of features, even if it comes at the expense of reliability, maintainability, complexity, etc.".

The latter is often recognized as a problem around here (and rightly so). It saddens me that the former then gets missed so often by the same people.

Show thread

I will never understand people complaining about JS (or any other language, for that matter) on the grounds that it doesn't have some very specific thing "in the standard library".

That's what a package manager is for, friend. So that you don't need to ship everyone's kitchensink with the language runtime whether you need it or not.

what do you call a tiny model of an alstom coradia train?

pocket lint.

Saw someone elsewhere assert that Britain is “one of the least corrupt countries in the world”, and couldn’t let that go unchallenged, so here’s what I said:

Only because of this one weird loophole, which I will explain below:

For the last decade, the previous government has been awarding public contracts for infrastructure, etc, to what are essentially shell companies run by their mates. These companies then do the bare minimum for as long as possible, which if you drive round the UK, is why you see all those road “improvement” works which do nothing and take forever and never seem to have anyone working. It took two years to replace a roundabout with a set of traffic lights near my apartment, for example. Other examples: large amounts of “PPE equipment” during Covid which turned out to be useless junk.

Obviously they aren’t actually spending anything but a trivial amount going through the motions, so what happens to the rest of the money, which let’s remember, was raised by taxes.

Well, it gets donated back to the ruling party as “political donations”, and then if the pretend contractor does a good enough job of this, they get an knighthood, or even a seat in the House of Lords for “services rendered”.

Now you might think that this sounds corrupt, and you would be right. It sounds deeply corrupt, but apparently it’s not because a lot of the global agencies which work out corruption indices are based in, checks notes, London, and are probably in on the scam, and get to define what “corruption” means, and define it to mean, “not this”.

Et voila! You have a country with one of the biggest wealth gaps in Europe funnelling vast amounts of public money to populist spaffers in government, all legal, laundered and sanitised.

The whole of UK society is like this. It’s how it works, and once you see it you either join in, or walk away in disgust.

Can I just say again to everyone in tech doing DEI: It is immoral and unethical to recruit women to a fundamentally unsafe environment

heat PSA:

get your meds into as cool and shady a place as possible, we're reaching temps that can render gels ineffectual for example

The fact Dwarf Fortress is decades in development shows that a great work can be a labour of years.
So don't beat yourself up if you can't manage something so great in the span of months.
Or something.
It's reassuring, in a way.

Language drift is an interesting thing. It used to be, twenty to thirty years ago, that "media" was just the plural form of "medium". Now "media" is its own (uncountable) thing and the plural of "medium" is "mediums".

heatposting 

1. hydrate yourself and others!

2. spend as much time as possible in the (indoor) shade!

3. give money to people who are unhoused!

4. try to account for your body experiencing heat stress when talking to other people or making decisions!

(Some of the channels affected aren't even really urban planning channels, just channels that happen to have done one video about urban planning)

Show thread

I've been noticing a very specific new pattern on YouTube lately: commenters under urban planning videos that talk about the Netherlands, saying that such-and-such is actually hated by Dutch people, or considered a mistake, or a waste of tax money, or whatever... only to be immediately contradicted by a bunch of other Dutch folks and then the original commenter either starts arguing some fallacious bullshit or just disappears.

Now it's not like Dutch people can't be making bullshit claims, but I find it suspicious how this is suddenly starting to happen across *multiple* urban planning channels, and none of the suspicious commenters seem to have any of the linguistic tells of a natively-Dutch English speaker.

why is it that every time I go to a protest, I see the same faces?

is it because they are the only people rich enough to skip work? the only people white enough to avoid police violence? the only people cis enough to risk jail? the only people who can afford to post bail?

no, they are poor people, people of color, trans people.

so where is everyone else?

google, firefox, browser development, and comments of mild impending doom 

There is a realistic chance that Google's funding of Firefox/Mozilla through default search engine deals will be struck down by a court in the current antitrust case.

If that happens, I do not think Mozilla can survive financially on their own, at least not at the scale they are operating at right now, despite their half-assed attempts at "creating other revenue streams" over the years. I also question the maintainability of their existing browser codebase.

So. If you've been contemplating whether to start building a new browser engine... now's the time to start. This is your advance warning. Make sure it's one you don't need millions of dollars for to maintain.

It's going to take a while, most likely, for all of this stuff to go through the courts, so there's time. But building a browser engine is a big task, too, and ideally it should be started *before* things implode over at Mozilla.

I've changed my mind on "a large scale is the problem" (eg. running large fediverse instances, but also many other things in the world) - sort of. It's generally not *wrong*, it's just not the root of the issue.

I think the actual root of the issue is high *stakes*. Building something at a large scale is a common way to increase the stakes of something, but it's not the only one - depending on what you're doing, doing it at a small scale can *still* be high stakes, and therefore still be a bad idea.

We'd all probably be a lot better off if people stopped building high-stakes things, and thought about low-stakes alternatives instead. It should be possible for things to go wrong or even very wrong without the impact being so immeasurably big.

Is het taalonderwijs inmiddels trouwens al wat gemoderniseerd, of gaan Nederlands-lessen nog steeds alleen over ABN terwijl docenten doen alsof dialecten en straattaal (oftewel de taal die mensen daadwerkelijk spreken) niet bestaan?

chat i request the following from you:

information about dutch folklore/tales/myths/legends whatever, especially characters/entities from such stories (regardless of the region of NL it comes from)

i shall cook
Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.