Show newer
reminder:
you should block/mute/unfollow people who make you feel uncomfortable, make you feel horrible about yourself, feel weird to see on your timeline, etc. there is no shame in it.

one of the largest science buildings is now rationing CO2 because we have turned away so many gas deliveries. Maybe the scabs still working will have to stop their experiments anyway

Show thread

Yesterday #UAW4811 rank and file successfully picketed unionized maintenance and delivery workers trying to work on water damage in #UCLA's Engineering 4 building. Today that building is shut down due to water damage. THAT is how you strike

one thing that having unmedicated adhd for 37 years has taught me is that you don't need to pay any attention to most stuff

@whitequark @mcc "The Recall team didn't make a conscious decision to exclude DRMed content" is relevant to the conversation about whether they put any thought into what they should be recording or not

why does every note/task/knowledge management system have like a whole ideology attached?

I don't want to reshape my thinking around stoic philosophy; I just want to remember when my next appointment is and what the ingredients are for that good burrito recipe.

another common thing that happens in error messages, that I've seen, is developers outright using the terms "request" and "response" to refer to HTTP requests and responses of any type, ignoring what the user actually did

like, "invalid response" could mean that the server failed, or that the server rejected a user's input, or that the client generated input which the server then rejected. since multiple requests and responses happen over the course of a regular page load, it's impossible to know which and it's just... useless.

HTTP codes that distinguish client and server errors aren't useful to an end user if the client and the server are both sending things back and forth automatically. the server sends a client page which decides what to send back to the server, and there, if the client messes up, it's still a server problem.

instead, we need web pages to actually distinguish between errors the user made and errors the browser made, instead of just saying everything is invalid and nobody knows who did it

Show thread

error messages should provide information that helps you resolve the error. simply describing the situations in which an error may occur is not helpful if they don't lead to a clear solution, and giving an error code that requires me to look up a manual is equally unhelpful. (however, using error codes to offer extra information in a manual is useful.)

I'm tired of errors that just say "whoops! it broke" without any further information. I'm tired of errors that patronise me and exhaustively list when an error might occur without saying which thing in the list occurred. I want useful information and not an assertion that information won't be given

Show thread

Oh hey! We kunnen dus wél iets doen tegen malafide beleggers die schaarse handel opkopen om zichzelf te verrijken...

als het om voetbal gaat dan. Niet om woningen.

re: politiek, NL, kritiek op kieswijzers 

Deze toot is geinspireerd door mastodon.pirateparty.be/@AstaM van @AstaMcCarthy, maar ik heb eigenlijk nog nooit een kieswijzer gezien die dit soort problemen niet heeft.

Show thread

politiek, NL, kritiek op kieswijzers 

Ik zou graag eens wat meer discussie zien over kieswijzers, en hoe ze in hun huidige opzet de democratie schaden. We doen alsof het optionele handige hulpmiddelen zijn, en het allemaal niet zo uitmaakt hoe ze werken, maar in de praktijk zijn het significante politieke stemmingmakers.

Om maar even twee problemen te noemen:

1. De neiging om de vraagstelling te laten bepalen door het 'publieke debat', wat dus een proxy is voor "waar de grote partijen campagnegeld in steken", waardoor standpunten van kleinere/specifiekere partijen volledig ondersneeuwen (en daarbij vaak de focus komt te liggen op repressieve onderwerpen).

2. Het weglaten van 'kleine' partijen uit kieswijzers, alsof ze er niet toe doen, waardoor je feitelijk alleen nog maar een race krijgt tussen de grote (steeds meer fuserende) gevestigde partijen en standpunten, waardoor we steeds dichterbij een two-party system komen.

Dit zijn dingen die we, als we echt iets geven om het idee van representatieve democratie, niet acceptabel zouden moeten vinden, en zeker niet af zouden moeten doen als "dat moeten de makers van de kieswijzers zelf weten".

Post from Existential Comics [@existentialcoms]

A silicon valley dude, creating billions of dollars in value: "what if we create an app that takes a little bit of everyone else's money whenever they do anything."

#technology

Da ich die letzten Tage wieder vermehrt Kommentare wie: "Ich weiß nicht was ich wählen soll, eigentlich will ich gar nicht" lese gibt es von mir jetzt einen Wahltipp.

Wählt einfach die Grünen. Nein sie sind nicht perfekt, das ist keine Partei. Sie haben aber den Vorteil das sie definitiv genug Stimmen haben werden um in Parlamente, Kreistage und Gemeinderäte zu kommen. Sie sind progressiver als alle anderen Großen und am Ende sorgt ihr im Zweifel dafür das sie mehr Macht bei Kompromissen haben.

Doing the “counting the number of people who aren't white men” thing again for the speaker line-up and audience photos for a recent conference for a computer thing.

And as usual, I am thoroughly disappointed 😒

Nice, the entire Faroe Islands is on strike

GNOME shill: "Tray icons are bad UX"
Me, desperately looking for an easy way to see which GUI apps I have running in the background:

The Book Wheel was an invention from the 16th century for people that needed multiple tabs open before browsers were invented.

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.