one of the largest science buildings is now rationing CO2 because we have turned away so many gas deliveries. Maybe the scabs still working will have to stop their experiments anyway
@whitequark @mcc "The Recall team didn't make a conscious decision to exclude DRMed content" is relevant to the conversation about whether they put any thought into what they should be recording or not
another common thing that happens in error messages, that I've seen, is developers outright using the terms "request" and "response" to refer to HTTP requests and responses of any type, ignoring what the user actually did
like, "invalid response" could mean that the server failed, or that the server rejected a user's input, or that the client generated input which the server then rejected. since multiple requests and responses happen over the course of a regular page load, it's impossible to know which and it's just... useless.
HTTP codes that distinguish client and server errors aren't useful to an end user if the client and the server are both sending things back and forth automatically. the server sends a client page which decides what to send back to the server, and there, if the client messes up, it's still a server problem.
instead, we need web pages to actually distinguish between errors the user made and errors the browser made, instead of just saying everything is invalid and nobody knows who did it
error messages should provide information that helps you resolve the error. simply describing the situations in which an error may occur is not helpful if they don't lead to a clear solution, and giving an error code that requires me to look up a manual is equally unhelpful. (however, using error codes to offer extra information in a manual is useful.)
I'm tired of errors that just say "whoops! it broke" without any further information. I'm tired of errors that patronise me and exhaustively list when an error might occur without saying which thing in the list occurred. I want useful information and not an assertion that information won't be given
re: politiek, NL, kritiek op kieswijzers
Deze toot is geinspireerd door https://mastodon.pirateparty.be/@AstaMcCarthy/112558757216512928 van @AstaMcCarthy, maar ik heb eigenlijk nog nooit een kieswijzer gezien die dit soort problemen niet heeft.
politiek, NL, kritiek op kieswijzers
Ik zou graag eens wat meer discussie zien over kieswijzers, en hoe ze in hun huidige opzet de democratie schaden. We doen alsof het optionele handige hulpmiddelen zijn, en het allemaal niet zo uitmaakt hoe ze werken, maar in de praktijk zijn het significante politieke stemmingmakers.
Om maar even twee problemen te noemen:
1. De neiging om de vraagstelling te laten bepalen door het 'publieke debat', wat dus een proxy is voor "waar de grote partijen campagnegeld in steken", waardoor standpunten van kleinere/specifiekere partijen volledig ondersneeuwen (en daarbij vaak de focus komt te liggen op repressieve onderwerpen).
2. Het weglaten van 'kleine' partijen uit kieswijzers, alsof ze er niet toe doen, waardoor je feitelijk alleen nog maar een race krijgt tussen de grote (steeds meer fuserende) gevestigde partijen en standpunten, waardoor we steeds dichterbij een two-party system komen.
Dit zijn dingen die we, als we echt iets geven om het idee van representatieve democratie, niet acceptabel zouden moeten vinden, en zeker niet af zouden moeten doen als "dat moeten de makers van de kieswijzers zelf weten".
Post from Existential Comics [@existentialcoms]
A silicon valley dude, creating billions of dollars in value: "what if we create an app that takes a little bit of everyone else's money whenever they do anything."
Da ich die letzten Tage wieder vermehrt Kommentare wie: "Ich weiß nicht was ich wählen soll, eigentlich will ich gar nicht" lese gibt es von mir jetzt einen Wahltipp.
Wählt einfach die Grünen. Nein sie sind nicht perfekt, das ist keine Partei. Sie haben aber den Vorteil das sie definitiv genug Stimmen haben werden um in Parlamente, Kreistage und Gemeinderäte zu kommen. Sie sind progressiver als alle anderen Großen und am Ende sorgt ihr im Zweifel dafür das sie mehr Macht bei Kompromissen haben.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.