Show newer

the absolute apathy of so many cis folks on here about threads harboring and encouraging transphobic terrorists is apalling.

don’t yell at me for not CWing this. yell at them for making me feel unsafe and unwelcome around them.

A writeup of US/UK/JP office culture like it's an uncontacted tribe

> The participants in the ritual begin by taking stimulants extracted by an elaborate process from the seeds of the Coffea arabica or Coffea canephora bush. Thus excited, they sit down in large isolated over-lit rooms and, in this paradoxically benign environment, spend most of the rest of the day focusing on papers and computers. In this way, their society decides who gets seen by doctors, who can travel, and who gets wealth.

I was told by a neighbour this morning that I am "the right kind of immigrant".

When asked to explain he said that I work and pay taxes. He didn't also say that I'm ok because I'm white but I wonder how the conversation would have gone if I had a different skin colour.

Am I reassured that because i am "the right kind of immigrant" everything will now be fine in the Netherlands after a quarter of the people who live around me just voted for a fascist, when the new speaker in our parliament is a conspiracy theorist as well as a fascist, and when most of the rest of the country appears to think that this is just fine ? No I am not.

I have more in common with asylum seekers and any other immigrants than I do with fascists or with unthinking voters for fascists.
#pvvisfascism
#RefugeesAreWelcomeHere

Never underestimate how many AI startups could be replaced wholesale with a single W3C proposal.

Show thread

meta meta meta 

I don't know that there's much point in continuing to patiently explain why people should defederate from Facebook's Threads, to be honest.

This has been explained so many times, the instances who are insisting on federating will almost certainly have had the opportunity to learn of the reasons and act accordingly, even if they claim they "don't see the problem". Many of them have even ignored or misrepresented the explanations addressed directly to them.

I think that by this point, it's much more reasonable to assume that the holdouts understand very well what the problems are with Facebook - they just either don't care, or they believe that whatever (they think) they will personally get out of the deal is more important than those issues.

The demographic distribution among those against vs. in favour of federation is probably like that for a reason...

I occasionally browse job listings for shits and giggles to see what companies are up to, and like

Imagine advertising an "event manager" position with the text "have you always wanted to be the boss?"

theres fediblock material on threads by the way, if you need reason beyond it being meta to justifying blocking them 

Libs of TikTok, PragerU and Gays Against Groomers all host accounts on threads right now as well as many transphobic and other generally horrible people... so

So, my parents just called to inform me about their city's disaster plan that was suddenly announced to them...

A little necessary backstory: my parents live in The Netherlands. They live in a city of the between 50k-100k inhabitants category, next to a highway, in an area that would flood with rising sea levels (province bordering the sea), but where nothing special has happened in their lifetimes so far. No earthquakes, no fires, nothing.

The Netherlands has a civil defense siren for disasters, and when it rings, the government advice is to remain where you are or get indoors if you aren't, to close all doors and windows, and to check the news station to see what's happening.

My parents told me they received a letter that explained the following: if a disaster were to strike, it's no longer the main plan to close your doors and windows and to remain where you are. If they get The Disaster Signal (no explanation what that would be) they now need to rush to their car.

From the area where they live, there is a small path meant for bicycles and pedestrians that leads to the highway. They need to rush their car over that path, to the highway.

The highway is blocked off from the bicycle path with a gigantic wall to minimize the car noise, but they've put a door in there that is just big enough so one car can pass at once. On top of the door is a new sign: disaster door. When The Disaster™ happens, the door will be opened. Everyone from that part of the city (at least 10k people) will have to enter the highway with their car through that door and flee.

They also told me that it was explained to them, that if someone doesn't have a car, they need to try to hitch a ride with someone else, or they'll have to call a certain number and the city might have someone pick them up.

I'm all sorts of confused. Are they expecting a disaster to happen for which you'll have to flee? If so, is it flooding? Does this mean they acknowledge climate change and are preparing for the worst (in a terrible way)? If everyone's rushing to their car, there will just be a massive traffic jam and nobody will reach that door in time for evacuation via that little bicycle path, right? And who's opening that door? Will people without a car really be picked up? What if sirens go off for something like a dangerous air pollutant, but everyone starts driving toward that door, like, how do they differentiate between possible disasters?

My parents got uncomfortable with any of my follow-up questions and just burst out laughing about how absurd it all is, and that I should "check the door" if I never hear from them again, and that if a person's time is up, it's just up and you die, nothing you can do about it, that's the way life goes. Sigh.

Anyway, does anyone have any experiences with or anecdotes about their area creating unexpected evacuation plans like this one? Have any of my Dutch readers had the same happen to them recently?

Can't think of any other explanation than that their city is preparing for a possible new watersnoodramp (North Sea flood of 1953) because they're in the general area of that. But to make it so inefficient and unclear... 🤔

#apocalypse #evacuation #DisasterPlanning

kind of meta, more philosophical 

Something very important to keep in mind when building community infrastructure, is that you haven't "lost" if some corporate alternative grows faster.

Fast growth is the domain of corporations. Invest a bag of money, get in, extract profits, get out, rinse and repeat. This model only makes sense if you don't fundamentally care about what you're building.

Community infrastructure grows differently; it grows slowly, organically, and sustainably. It doesn't need to be "first to market", or "scale fast", or "beat the competition", or "provide short-term profits", or any of the other things that corporate infrastructure need to do.

All it needs to do is *be there*, and slowly but surely incrementally improve over time, until such a time that it is unquestionably the best place for people to be, and untouchable by corporations. It's a marathon, not a sprint.

It has no "runway", no "deadlines". All that matters is making it a comfortable place that works for people, and getting people engaged in its continued development. On-boarding people folks slowly so that you're not just increasing numbers, you're actually having people stick around for the long term.

Basically: community infrastructure is just fundamentally more resilient, because it doesn't have the trappings of corporate goals. But you do need to take advantage of that resiliency, and not try to emulate corporate objectives that you can never meet.

Resist the temptation to maximize user numbers, and work on resilient infrastructure and loyal communities instead.

(This post inspired by the situation with fedi vs. Bluesky, but it's definitely not exclusive to it)

The last time Facebook embraced an open federated standard they did it for precisely long enough to saturate server-to-server contacts between an already existing userbase and their stuff, then shut off that federation and told anyone cut off by it to just come to Facebook instead.

This is literally something they did. This is in their playbook.

The people running the stuff behind the scenes were blindsided by it; it was an executive decision. Those people wanted to build the thing in good faith and the Business Plan was to let them until the time was right to strike.

That we're again going "It seems to be done right, let's give them a chance" is a little infuriating considering I was pretty impacted by the fallout of the last time.

it's the christmas dota update, everyone who smurfed got a gift box full of coal that permabans them when they get it, tons of streamers who were smurfing got the coal live.
oh fun christmas gift box, full of coal permabanned and vacban

(btw he reads "banned until 1/18?" but fails to read that the ban is until 1/18/2038)

(video source: clips.twitch.tv/CheerfulFrozen)
#dota2

Threads, fediblock meta 

@SallyStrange@eldritch.cafe

The pro-federation camp has also repeatedly tried to dishonestly frame the possibility of an admin making an instance block decision with which their users disagree as an example of tyranny.

I think the most obvious response to this line of argument is to point out that the people making it are always using instances which block other instances. They will often say something like "blocking instances just takes choices away from users!" Essentially, they are trying to shift the discussion away from the merits of threads itself, and towards an abstract philosophical argument about blocking in general.

But if they were really against blocking instances at all, they coudl use an instance that doesn't block anyone or anything. And yet, they (usually) don't. That fact indicates that their desire to federate with threads.net isn't based on an abstract opposition to blocking, but based on something about threads.net in particular.

And that's where the conversation
should be: why does threads.net deserve preferential treatment that wouldn't be afforded to poa.st or spinster.xyz?

I still can't wrap my head around the fact that weapons, violence and gore can be shown and discussed freely basically anywhere, but god forbid you see a nipple or merely discuss the concept of sex

re: meta 

How difficult is it to not pollute a tag you don't care for, jesus christ

Show thread

meta 

And another Fediblock polluter goes into the blocklist

"I was given some advice before making it into Parliament - to not take anything personally or it'll eat you up."

"In only a couple of weeks, in only 14 days, this Government has attacked my whole world from every corner."

"Health, taiao (environment), wai (water), whenua (land), natural resources, Māori wards, reo, tamariki. How can I not take anything personally when it feels like these policies were made about me?"

"I am not fearful of this place, or this debating chamber."

"I was perfectly fine growing my kūmara and learning maramataka (Māori lunar calendar), but this House kept tampering with things they shouldn't be touching, and that's why I left the māra (garden) to come here."

-- Hana-Rawhiti Kareariki Maipi-Clarke (NZ MP for Hauraki-Waikato, and the youngest NZ MP to serve in 130 years)

#Maori #NewZealand #Aoteroa #Aboriginal #Indigenous #Decolonise #SovereigntyNeverCeded #Treaty #FuckRacism #FuckWhiteness #FuckColonisation

somewhat related to the threads meta:

for the last few months i've been giving out the fake email "fuckzuck@fb.com" to marketing databases when required to enter something on a wlan captive portal

International ticket planning is like "well, if you go in the direction of Austria for 30 minutes, you're gonna be in Poland one hour earlier"

facebook threads meta 

@Rairii it's so weird watching obscenely rich people compete to do something others have already done for free with no money

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.