There’s a bizarre feedback loop in large language models. If, as they often say, the data used to build them mostly comes from the web then we have to consider the social and economic forces that shape that language … one of the biggest forces in shaping the way people write on the web is algorithmic advertising and algorithmic recommendations (which has become hard to separate from advertising) … now llm’s are being pushed for “search” and recommendation applications …
so the language that comes out of these models is already highly shaped by the corporate algorithms we’ve been dealing with for the past 15 years and is now driving the continued proliferation of that style of English … it feels like a cybernetic system with negative feedback, slowly moving towards homeostasis … another way to put it is that it is a massive homogenizing force for language, specifically a type of Silicon Valley English that has already spread across the world via corporate algorithms.
capitalism grumbles, minecraft
Awesome, another thing ruined by capitalism
https://www.reddit.com/r/feedthebeast/comments/uswnhe/psa_curseforge_has_started_enforcing_restrictions/
this is what i mean when i say that we've been lying to ourselves that Hollywood is liberal or progressive. it's not. while superficially, the sci-fi, comic book, and speculative fiction movies and shows appear to wave a progressive flag in the culture war, the bones of products like "The Last of Us" are profoundly reactionary, libertarian, conservative.
two assumptions in the speculative world of "The Last of Us" that bother me: 1) society will immediately collapse and turn to ultra-violence in the absence of a top-down capitalist structure telling everyone what to do, but also 2) capitalist products like bullets, fossil fuels, roads, and men standing around with guns are a natural part of the world that can be expected to exist in the absence of capitalism.
Producing Transdermal Estrogen: A Do-It-Yourself Guide
https://crimethinc.com/estrogen
In this report, a small collective details how they produced and distributed transdermal estrogen using reproducible do-it-yourself methods. This is an experiment aimed at securing the agency and autonomy of everyone who seeks gender self-determination.
sort of a subtoot but also not
I regularly see people going "I miss gopher, websites are infested with junk nowadays" and like... I was around for the web around the 2000s and many (HTTP) websites back then *didn't* have all that junk, so associating this with the protocol used seems rather odd?
Like, all that junk didn't magically come into existence, there's a reason for it, and "it uses HTTP" is not that reason
meta, the Book
Look, I get that it's funny to dunk on that Mastodon for Dummies book. But there's also a bunch of comments along the lines of "oh no now we'll have to deal with the normies" which ehhhhh.
Like, this is a book that - while I haven't read it - explicitly says "Adapt to Mastodon's ways" on the cover *and* also talks about non-Mastodon fedi things. That already puts it miles above nearly every journalist(tm) article about fedi.
Does this *really* deserve the same kind of scorn? Because a bunch of comments I've seen are starting to sound much less like "annoyance at influx" and much more like actual gatekeeping. Can we... not, please?
Like, if someone is willing to read a whole book to learn how to use Mastodon the right way and not step on people's toes, that seems to me like something that should be encouraged.
CW meta-ish? A thing I didn’t want to say until the influx died down
The thing about CW etiquette and a certain kind of new user(*) is that it’s exactly like teaching manners to small children. You have to start with simple rules and clear boundaries because they’re easy to explain as a basis for more nuanced understanding that comes later. And the responses are largely the same too - “that’s silly”, and “you can’t make me”, and “technically it doesn’t count if I do it this way”.
(*) cishet white guys who’ve apparently never been asked to change their behaviour before
“The reason most public transportation is seen as ‘losing’ money is precisely because it charges for trips. If you don't charge fares, suddenly it can't ‘lose’ money. It just costs money, the same as the roads.”
This random comment has given me my new favourite argument for removing fares from public transit.
Venture capital destroyed the internet that I grew up with. It destroyed all the good, interesting, weird things. It destroyed the API-first world we had. It infected the internet with surveillance capitalism.
Venture capital destroys everything it touches. It's going to try to destroy the fedi, and it's upon us to resist that.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.