I really love writing characters where your first impression of them is both terrible and correct, and they still grow on you anyway because people are complex and there's good in them, too.
This is hard to get right and doesn't work for every reader. But when it works, it's magic.
Some of my favourites: Usther from Tombtown, Hanna from NPC, and Boro from Space Dragons.
I read a book by @rowyn recently that was absolutely masterful at this.
💸 Germany sends €204.5M to Microsoft annually while European open-source projects need investment.
Our Account Manager's analysis shows how redirecting these funds could:
✔️End vendor lock-in cycles
✔️Strengthen data sovereignty
✔️Create local tech jobs
✔️Support FLOSS innovation
XWiki, CryptPad and other open-source solutions prove alternatives exist, they just need proper funding.
Read the full analysis here: https://xwiki.com/en/Blog/why-governments-should-invest-in-open-source/
“We found that the wealthiest 10% contributed 6.5 times more to global warming than the average, with the top 1% and 0.1% contributing 20 and 76 times more, respectively,” the write in their paper, published on Wednesday in the journal Nature Climate Change. Co-author Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, said: “If everyone had emitted like the bottom 50% of the global population, the world would have seen minimal additional warming since 1990"
The only dangerous minority are the rich.
@tay I always make sure to post some very unhingedly horny stuff if one of my tech posts escapes containment.
Either it scares off the people who follow for the tech post, or it awakens something. Either outcome is acceptable to me 🤣
So it's finally come to this:
multiple uncoordinated global-scale experiments with unpredictable permanent climactic consequences
instead of just telling petrostates and oil barons to get fucked and switching our grids to wind and solar
Apropos the UK's ARIA doing crazy funding here's a link to a paper I'm a co-author on (soon to be accepted I think) where we argue against polar #geoengineering in rather strong terms.
TL;DR:
"We evaluate five highly-publicized polar 'geoengineering' proposals and point to significant issues and risks relating to technological availability, logistical feasibility, cost, predictable adverse consequences, environmental damage, scalability (in time and space), governance, and ethics. According to our assessment, no current geoengineering idea passes an objective and comprehensive test regarding its use in the coming decades. Rather, many of the proposed ideas are environmentally dangerous. Given their feasibility challenges and risks of negative consequences, these ideas should not distract from the priority to reduce greenhouse gas emissions."
uspol, infosec
https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/06/us_dod_software_procurement/
There's something kind of hilarious about calling the current software security practices "outdated" and then arguing for a return to the known-broken processes (like origin-based security assurances) that organizations have been trying to move away from for the past two decades...
But then it's entirely on-brand for fascists to try and market old, failed ideas as if they are some kind of novel innovation, isn't it
My favorite random local news station in a place I don't live is KTVB in Boise. Yesterday, they reported that the City of Boise made the #pride flag an official city flag so that they aren't prohibited from flying it by the state of Idaho.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
Feel free to flirt, but if you want to actually meet up and/or do something with me, lewd or otherwise, please tell me explicitly or I won't realize :) I'm generally very open to that sort of thing!
Further boundaries: boosts are OK (including for lewd posts), DMs are open. But the devil doesn't need an advocate; I'm not interested in combative arguing in my mentions. I am however happy to explain things in-depth when asked non-combatively.
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.