I'm here for honest and sincere discussion. I enjoy it!
And often after a post of mine's been shared a few hundred times, the replyfolk come out. It's like they're trying to score some sort of magical algorithm points, and those just don't exist here in the fediverse.
I think instances should start enforcing bans on that sort of "edgy contrarian" attitude- it'll make this place a lot nicer, IMO.
If folks try to be edgelords in my comments, I'll call them out on it. If they continue, I just block and move on.
This world is being destroyed by edgelords who think they're clever, and I'm done playing games around it.
If you see someone being edgy to make a point, call them out. Lets send the trolls back under the bridge.
> If blasting CO2 into the air and ruining all of our freshwater and traumatizing cheap laborers and making every sysadmin you know miserable and ripping off code and books and art at scale and ruining our fucking democracy isn’t enough for you to leave this shit alone, what is?
https://drewdevault.com/2025/03/17/2025-03-17-Stop-externalizing-your-costs-on-me.html
Also, importantly: your friends and relatives are probably not going to care about the gory internal details of a Linux system.
They won't care that there are different "desktop environments", or about the distinction between a DE and a WM, or about different UI toolkits, package managers, whatever. Just skip all that.
What they *are* going to care about is whether it will update automatically, whether the UI matches what they expect, whether they can change the colors, whether the things they need work and are reachable with a single shortcut. They will care about what the system does *for them*.
For example, instead of asking "what desktop environment do you want, GNOME or KDE?", boot a few different live images for them that use different desktop environments (or one that lets you swap) and ask them which one looks the best to them. Then install with that one.
Likewise, don't ask what "distro" they want; pick a distro that will be able to run most things out of the box, and that you are sufficiently comfortable providing support for. If they unexpectedly end up a Linux nerd, they can always switch later.
You are just installing "Linux" for them, configuring it for them based on their preferences, and telling them that you can explain more about any part of it if they're curious to know more. That's it.
Provide details if they ask, but not if they don't, or you'll just overwhelm them. Providing details upfront just makes most people assume that all of it is 'required knowledge', even if that's not what you meant.
Convincing people to give Linux a try is going to be a lot easier when there's a direct, chargeable-to-creditcard cost associated with continuing to use Windows, the thing they are familiar with.
That's your strategic advantage. Just make sure not to waste it by being condescending or patronizing, and always prioritize *their* needs in the process, not yours.
i saw this bluesky post last week and have been thinking about roomba accidentally saw outside ever since. (screenshot and alt text stolen from there) https://bsky.app/profile/seamas.bsky.social/post/3lkduzth3cs2c
Hey, so, in light of Microsoft killing off Windows 10 in October (https://digipres.club/@misty/114190352645015060)...
If you want more people to use Linux, now would probably be a good time to start talking to your friends and relatives about how Linux will still work and get updates and, most importantly, *offer to help them setting it up and keeping it working*.
And ideally, take notes of what problems they run into, because those notes are going to give you a pretty good idea of what needs changing for Linux to become more widely usable to people. Maybe you could even contribute some of the fixes yourself!
I really can't get over how irresponsible it is for MS to tell people to throw away or recycle perfectly working computers. There are so many machines people *could* keep using for much longer if not for Windows 11.
https://mastodon.social/@dosnostalgic/114184937238415364
Everything checks out with this thing, voltages are good, given everything a damn good wiggle and it's stubbornly refusing to fail like it's supposed to
I also love the discussion threads that are all like "oh but that's a myth, Edison didn't 'rip off' Tesla, he just ran a company that Tesla worked for and that patented the company's intellectual property"
My guy, my dude, etc.
@welshpixie Building a community around a product that has an offensive name will surely be a welcoming and healthy community that will grow to an extent that could rival commercial alternatives.
Nothing problematic or toxic could ever thrive in that environment for sure
Ik ben niet gewend dat dingen bij de gemeente *sneller* gaan dan verwacht, al heeft de gemeente 's-Hertogenbosch me al vaker verrast met dit soort dingen. Misschien ben ik gewoon pessimistisch geworden door de gemeente Dordrecht ofzo.
The Pebble smartwatch team shares all of the ways Apple prevents other smartwatches from doing the same thing that Apple Watch does.
Your smartwatch can’t send texts, respond to notifications or talk to iOS apps unless it’s an Apple Watch. No one is allowed to build a device that connects to an iPhone as well as an Apple device.
https://ericmigi.com/blog/apple-restricts-pebble-from-being-awesome-with-iphones
@monorail "dialogue in movies is so fake, why do they always have all this staged exposition?" *watches primer* "exposition is good, actually"
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.