I am (still) looking for programming languages that meet the two following requirements:
1. Has a project-local, nested dependency/module mechanism (see https://wiki.slightly.tech/books/miscellaneous-notes/page/transitive-dependencies-and-the-commons for explanation)
2. Does *not* have an import-all feature; ie. a way to import a module that causes all its contents to be injected into scope directly. I want languages that require explicit references of some kind (prefixing things with the module name is good enough).
Ah yes, rubber "recycling" - shredding tires and stuffing it into the soil as filler: https://hermeq.nl/nl/rubber-mulch.html
Really raises the question of where the boundary between "recycling" and "landfill" even is, doesn't it
is there a tool for #linux that gives me a bunch of drag-and-droppable colourful boxes with editable text content?
i do not care what kind of tool it is meant to be. if it is a task manager or a mind map tool or whatever. i want colorful boxes, i want to put text into them, i want to freely arrange and rearrange them into a linear list, i want to be able to scroll down if the list gets very long, and i want to spend 0 minutes on drawing the boxes myself or resizing them or whatever. please recommend a tool that does that
re: uspol, angry
@joepie91 it's also called "appeasement". You know, something that worked out very well in Europe in the years of 1933 to 1940 /s
uspol, angry
What particularly pisses me off is how some people are going "well Zelenskyy should not have pressed the issue of security guarantees, and just accepted the implicit promise".
First of all, an 'implicit promise' is worth fuck all when you are dealing with someone who has no sense of obligation towards promises in the first place, like Trump. If it's not on paper or video, it doesn't exist.
But perhaps more important is the underlying subtext of this criticism. Because that subtext is "well you know Trump is volatile and unreliable, so you shouldn't do anything to provoke him, and instead navigate around it".
That's a very familiar pattern. You know what it's called? "Enabling an abuser" and "victim blaming".
PSA: Europe PubMed Central exists.
"Europe PMC provides comprehensive access to life sciences literature from trusted sources. It's available to anyone, anywhere for free. With Europe PMC you can search and read 45.6 million publications [10.5 full texts], prereprints and other documents enriched with links to supporting data, reviews, protocols, and other relevant resources."
https://europepmc.org/
Scope: https://europepmc.org/Help#sources
Also @SafeguardingResearch got the database of #PubMed
uspol, angry
@joepie91 There's genuinely no outcome where Trump hadn't thrown a fit and pulled support
It's a nice community, until you witness things going south, and then you take notice of so many other lingering issues that the best course of action is to keep a healthy distance, and maybe talk to folks within that also notice the same issues but actually have the means to work on change
@anarchiv yeah it seems pointless to me to try to explain in detail how a different system would work, to someone who thinks that this (gestures at everything) is an example of something that works.
"Normally, when you challenge the conventional wisdom — that the current economic and political system is the only possible one — the first reaction you are likely to get is a demand for a detailed architectural blueprint of how an alternative system would work, down to the nature of its financial instruments, energy supplies, and policies of sewer maintenance. Next, you are likely to be asked for a detailed program of how this system will be brought into existence. Historically, this is ridiculous. When has social change ever happened according to someone’s blueprint? It’s not as if a small circle of visionaries in Renaissance Florence conceived of something they called 'capitalism,' figured out the details of how the stock exchange and factories would someday work, and then put in place a program to bring their visions into reality."
Dear #language friends,
is there a term for the thing where you forgot what something is really called and instead make up a new term that makes sense in context?
Examples:
- "drippy basket" for "dish drying rack"
- "food weapons" for "cutlery/silverware/flatware"
- "cobra chicken" for "Canada goose"
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.