i don't understand folks who are like "ceos do important work, they deserve to get paid more than others"
bro. if not for the janitors you'd drown in shit. if not for the workers and engineers, the receptionists, the call centre operators, the couriers, the designers and accountants and god knows who else, your enterprise would come to a screeching, dead halt.
what a machine is without its cogs? a husk of useless metal. so don't be a bootlicker. CEOs wouldn't get anywhere without our labor
We just deployed a first version of an FAQ page for #fluConf2025
We'll continue to update it as necessary, and we're working on adding a number of clarifications to the text on our other pages
If you've been at the #38c3 Onion Cluster assembly, or we've otherwise met in person around congress, get tested for Covid-19 ASAP.
There has been at least two positive antigen test results, one from me, one from someone else at the assembly cluster.
rape apologia
@joepie91 be excellent to each other, unless it forces you to engage with problematic beliefs you might hold
I was just reading https://thenewstack.io/what-happens-to-relicensed-open-source-projects-and-their-forks/, about the contributor dynamics of formerly-open-source projects that were closed down, and their community forks.
There's not very much concrete data in this article, but it does suggest something very interesting: that there seems to have been a set of people who *wanted* to contribute to a project, but were somehow unable to when it was under corp-centralized stewardship, and only became able to when there was a multi-stakeholder fork.
Clearly the license was not originally a problem. So what was? Was the governance of the original project hostile to external contributors on an organizational level?
"This is literally a DDoS on the entire internet.
"I am so tired."
rape apologia
If your response to a discussion about rape and sexual assault is something to the effect of "that is what we have the legal system for" or "they should have gone to the police", then you frankly need to shut the fuck up and actually listen to a victim some day, because you clearly have *no idea* what you are talking about.
In unrelated news, guess what the response in some CCC circles was to the protest at #38c3
Alien Intruder is a new game for DOS where you save people from aliens and get to the exit. It's free, really easy to pick up, and it's always fun for me to fire up DOSBox to play a new game
Update: I got some help. Thanks for sharing!
Is there someone at #38C3 with Android forensic skills and is willing to analyze a Fairphone that was seized by the German police who decrypted the contents with Cellebrite? I'd like to know if there are traces of the access and possible manipulations.
DM me if you want to help
Boost OK
i've been told my whole life that bugs are weird or scary or gross. i took it to heart, rarely sharing my interest in them. hiding that i find them beautiful and fascinating. but being on here, seeing so many share my excitement has really helped me fully embrace my love for all things creepy and crawly. i love your bug pictures and i love your appreciation for them. thank you for that, even if no one else in your life appreciates bugs, i do.
@jstevenyork it’s in the interests of the billionaire owned centralised social media to destroy any alternative because it show a different possibility so of course we hear ‘Mastodon is dead’ all the time. #Mastodon doesn’t have to be the biggest to win it just has to exist.
My mom, who is in her 70s, and not particularly tech savvy, just explained that she hates Google now, because the first results are always AI, which just pulls from other sources and is usually inaccurate.
So let’s stop assuming that non-techies, older people, and mothers and grandmothers are too naive to see through the hype. Mostly it’s the tech bros and finance douches who are too stupid to actually understand what they’re boosting.
Meta, somewhat subtoot, queer theory
I enjoy reading theory and creating new analyses of the world, and the queer experience, and my experience, etc.
But I'm so surprised by how I constantly see people come up with very specific theories (that may or may not be entirely correct! That's not the point here) about e.g. who is and is not allowed to use certain words like transmisogyny to describe their experiences (but this dynamic has happened before in previous discussions)
And they are SO certain, so assured that they're right. And everyone else in the queer community must immediately be onboard with the theory and with its new rules about who is allowed to use what words. Even while there are several other queer people arguing the opposite, in good faith.
What I want to say is this: theory is useful and important. But also, don't use it as a bludgeon to create rifts in the queer community.
Queer and trans people of all kinds (transfems, transmascs, non-binary people, furries, etc) are my siblings, fighting my same fight. Specific details about how they experience their oppression may be different, and it's useful (and fun!) to think about that. What's not useful is to argue about those details, or what the best name for them may be, in a way that further divides our communities.
If that starts happening, maybe it's time to reconsider, if not the theory itself, then at least your communication strategy.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
Feel free to flirt, but if you want to actually meet up and/or do something with me, lewd or otherwise, please tell me explicitly or I won't realize :) I'm generally very open to that sort of thing!
Further boundaries: boosts are OK (including for lewd posts), DMs are open. But the devil doesn't need an advocate; I'm not interested in combative arguing in my mentions. I am however happy to explain things in-depth when asked non-combatively.
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.