Meta, somewhat subtoot, queer theory
I enjoy reading theory and creating new analyses of the world, and the queer experience, and my experience, etc.
But I'm so surprised by how I constantly see people come up with very specific theories (that may or may not be entirely correct! That's not the point here) about e.g. who is and is not allowed to use certain words like transmisogyny to describe their experiences (but this dynamic has happened before in previous discussions)
And they are SO certain, so assured that they're right. And everyone else in the queer community must immediately be onboard with the theory and with its new rules about who is allowed to use what words. Even while there are several other queer people arguing the opposite, in good faith.
What I want to say is this: theory is useful and important. But also, don't use it as a bludgeon to create rifts in the queer community.
Queer and trans people of all kinds (transfems, transmascs, non-binary people, furries, etc) are my siblings, fighting my same fight. Specific details about how they experience their oppression may be different, and it's useful (and fun!) to think about that. What's not useful is to argue about those details, or what the best name for them may be, in a way that further divides our communities.
If that starts happening, maybe it's time to reconsider, if not the theory itself, then at least your communication strategy.
Visual Artists:
Has knowing about #AI generated art had an impact on your art?
That is, have you shifted the focus or style of your work? Have you felt the need to make "making of" or process gifs/videos/image sequences to show how your work is created (to make it clear it is human made?)
Do you now use (or not use) certain elements/tools to distance your work from AI images? (For example, switching back to pen and paper.)
Check all that apply:
Laziness does not exist
From the archive earlier this month: For the GRP 127 Tour du Brabant Wallon in Belgium SGR at multiple locations had difficulties finding locations for placing waymarkers, because of a lack of fences and trees. They solved that with those handmade wood carved maps before a section without signposts. This is the one near Chapelle du Rond Chêne in Tourinnes-la-Grosse.
PSA: Bitte nutzt unsere taktilen Karten am #38c3 nicht als Ablagefläche. Nicht lang, nicht kurz mal was abstellen, einfach gar nicht.
Wenn ihr etwas auf einem Tisch seht, helft bitte mit es zu entfernen damit die Karten benutzbar bleiben!
Danke!
#a11y #accessibility
“Casual Viewing | Issue 49 | n+1 | Will Tavlin”
https://www.nplusonemag.com/issue-49/essays/casual-viewing/
> According to Netflix’s rubric, two users who watch the first half of Sweet Girl and close their laptops equal one full “view” — as do 110 users who each watch a single minute.
Good, if depressing, read.
Hotel 'security' has been defeated once again.
I wonder how universal the password for the Mifare Ultralight is? Specific to the hotel, or across the entire chain?
You don't need to write your own code for your opinion on FOSS to matter. We want to hear from people organizing communities, operating their own social networks, and engaging with open media.
How do you approach governance of your platforms? What are your strategies for moderating online spaces? How do other approaches affect your willingness to participate in existing communities?
Apply for FluConf's track on Community-operated social networks, governance, and moderation by January 19th, 2025:
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
Feel free to flirt, but if you want to actually meet up and/or do something with me, lewd or otherwise, please tell me explicitly or I won't realize :) I'm generally very open to that sort of thing!
Further boundaries: boosts are OK (including for lewd posts), DMs are open. But the devil doesn't need an advocate; I'm not interested in combative arguing in my mentions. I am however happy to explain things in-depth when asked non-combatively.
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.