@aeva Mixbox has a nice paint simulation. https://scrtwpns.com/mixbox/painter/
COVID pandemic
mind you, we still believe that it's a moral obligation to, at a bare minimum, bear witness to what happened.
it's just so frustrating how the foundation of consensus reality is denial. fighting against something like that is a lot.
Help please!
I have a distinct memory memory of a machine from my childhood, used in grocery stores around New England [probably primarily New Jersey or Connecticut.]
There was a machine that would tie together groceries instead of bagging them. It was placed over top or in place of the checkout belt [after the register] and used twine. It was fast and super cool and I remember being needlessly fascinated by it.
This would have been in the 90s.
Anyone have -any- clue what I'm talking about?
You know, "no politics" is a terrible rule. It sucks because it allows bad actors to separate things into "normal" and "political". Like gay people are "political".
Everything is political in a way.
But the solution is not to always constantly spam (usually US) electoral politics and headline news shit everywhere.
"Meet the underpaid workers in Nairobi, Kenya, who power OpenAI"
https://pivot-to-ai.com/2024/11/30/meet-the-underpaid-workers-in-nairobi-kenya-who-power-openai/
consider the following English words:
slut sly slush slaughter slums slur slit slow slap sloth slip slam slog slick slide slime sleazy slack sled
get the vibe? sl- is not a morpheme, not really. it doesn't *mean* a thing. but it conveys a certain sensation, a feeling of wet stickiness, and also frames that sensation as negative. linguists call this sound symbolism; English is particularly rich in it, sound sequences that suggest a feeling.
anyway what I am saying is, the collective wisdom that picked up "slop" to describe the output of "AI" dealt a very significant blow to the AI industry, on the force of this word choice alone. excellent noospheric self-defence
Webnerds! Is there something like a codepen that doesn't suck? hopefully an app I can install, something without ADs or accounts, or support for 9000 different CSS frameworks or any of that crap
I just want a thingy, that makes it easy for me to prototype UIs using bare CSS, HTML and perhaaaaaps a little bit of JS
And I know there's a lot of people who'll read that and think, "Oh that old nugget. I can't believe she's malding about some junk mail." But that's the fucking point? I'm over 40. I've seen some bullshit. And here I am spending 10 minutes getting increasingly excited about telling my partner about this as I'm looking for tricks how this paper wasn't legally lying to me about winning money, money that would really take a strain off, until I found the trick. The trick I knew had to be there. A trick they've been doing for at least a decade now, probably way longer. There are people who aren't able to look for those tricks, or who don't spot them. How many people make that call and give away their info, excited at the idea they won something other than landfill e-waste, only to be let down? They shouldn't be thrown to the wolves! This shouldn't be okay! Fuck the people that not only come up with this grift, but also the people so uncreative they recycle it whole cloth! I haven't even gotten to the part yet where they reveal the prestige, and I already feel like shit because I foolishly believed for a moment something nice was unexpectedly happening. The silver lining gave me mercury poisoning.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
Feel free to flirt, but if you want to actually meet up and/or do something with me, lewd or otherwise, please tell me explicitly or I won't realize :) I'm generally very open to that sort of thing!
Further boundaries: boosts are OK (including for lewd posts), DMs are open. But the devil doesn't need an advocate; I'm not interested in combative arguing in my mentions. I am however happy to explain things in-depth when asked non-combatively.
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.