just saw a neat feature on someone's wireless headphones. it has a removable battery so you can quickly swap it out for a spare, but it also has either a second internal battery or a supercap so the headphones stay powered and connected while you're swapping the battery over. no idea of the make/model, was just observing someone do the swap and noticed it didn't power off.
If you heard how Unity stiffed the startup I work for with a $5k/year per person license, and thought “nah, it’s because they are making weird VR software. I’m safe.” You should think twice! They even go after people you’ve worked with!
Do NOT start a new project with Unity. They have a division tasked with making you regret it.
my friend @rail_ told me they really liked this picture so i'm posting it
Maintenance tip for possible design flaw for Framework 13 laptops
I own a Framework 13 (i7-1260p) laptop which on rare occasions suffered from agonizing slowness. This was usually fixed by a reboot so I always thought it was some quirk with Linux.
However, it was not.
A few weeks ago I while I was playing Factorio, the performance suddenly dropped from one moment to the other. A reboot did not help.
While we'll celebrate Indigenous Feast Day it's also The National Day of Mourning on Thursday.
Educate yourselves. Educate your children. Educate your family.
You have a lot to be thankful for but it comes at our expense.
"Where can I shove a blockchain in?"
Please don't.
Blockchains are about establishing consensus in a world where you can't trust anyone. They're a libertarian macho bullshit fantasy that also boils the oceans.
If you can't imagine a way to build consensus with your community without relying on a technology that is actively harmful to the future, then you lack imagination and creativity.
"be gay do crime" aber auf deutsch? das geht so:
Sehr geehrte Lesenden,
unter Bezugnahme auf die fortschreitende gesellschaftliche Differenzierung und in Übereinstimmung mit der Zielsetzung, die strukturelle Integration pluralistischer Lebensentwürfe zu fördern, möchten wir Ihnen im Rahmen dieses Schreibens eine fundierte Grundlage zur intellektuellen Auseinandersetzung und potenziellen praktischen Anwendung subversiv-symbolischer Handlungsstrategien nahelegen.
Es erscheint aus verwaltungsrechtlicher sowie sozialphilosophischer Perspektive angezeigt, eine kritische Reflexion bestehender hegemonialer Diskurse und normativer Ordnungen zu befördern. Diese sollen im Lichte einer theoretisch fundierten und performativ-symbolischen Praxis hinterfragt werden, die auf die Dekonstruktion sozio-struktureller Asymmetrien sowie die Sichtbarmachung institutionalisierter Diskriminierungsmechanismen abzielt. Hierbei könnte eine bewusste Abweichung von traditionellen Konventionen als konzeptionelle Grundlage dienen, um transformative Impulse innerhalb des gesellschaftlichen Diskurses zu initiieren.
Eine solche Methodik umfasst die deliberative Wahl einer von den gängigen normativen Erwartungshaltungen abweichenden Identitätsgestaltung. Dabei ist ausdrücklich die Möglichkeit der Implementierung symbolisch widerständischer Verhaltensweisen in Betracht zu ziehen, die in einem diskursiven Sinne eine Rekontextualisierung von Machtstrukturen und sozialen Hierarchien ermöglichen könnten. Es sei dabei hervorgehoben, dass die juristische Bewertung derartiger Handlungen im Rahmen eines analytischen Ansatzes sekundär zu betrachten ist, sofern deren primäres Ziel die kritische Hinterfragung und Reform gesellschaftlicher Ordnungsprinzipien darstellt.
Die vorliegende Empfehlung richtet sich insbesondere an jene Akteur*innen, die sich durch einen hohen Grad an Engagement für soziale Gerechtigkeit, Diversität und integrative Werte auszeichnen. Ziel ist die Etablierung eines paradigmatischen Dialogs, welcher die Transformation bestehender gesellschaftlicher Machtstrukturen begünstigt und den Weg für eine nachhaltige, pluralistische Gesellschaft ebnet.
Sollten Sie Interesse an einer weiterführenden Beratung, an spezifischen Leitfäden zur konzeptionellen Ausarbeitung nonkonformistischer Strategien oder an der Teilnahme an einschlägigen Fachseminaren zu den Themen Identitätsdiversifizierung, strukturelle Normenkritik und subversive Praxisformen haben, steht Ihnen unser Referat für weiterführende Anfragen zur Verfügung.
Mit verbindlichsten Grüßen und den besten Wünschen für Ihr Engagement zur kritischen Weiterentwicklung gesellschaftlicher Strukturen,
Ember
Hauptreferent*in für Normendekonstruktion und Antikonformismus
Ministerium für Gesellschaftliche Kohärenz, Hegemonialkritik und Antikonformistisches Handeln
RE: https://catcatnya.com/users/cache/statuses/113554716370750422
And, to be clear, everything I describe above would have to be done with the full consent of (at least the network administrators of a given network if not actually) the end user.
You, or someone who administers your machine, would need to trust the certificate authority. You, or someone who administers your networks, would need to select and use these altDNS servers.
You would need to choose to use a browser that supported the services we designed.
I'm not talking about a vector for attack, but rather one for liberation.
Early DNS operated by a bunch of folks literally passing around copies of their host files. Modern DNS has replaced that with a for profit system backed by an allegedly non-profit organization.
The DNS servers that your network uses are probably respecting ICANN, and probably have consensus with most of the rest of the DNS servers in the world, but they don't have to. I could set up a DNS server right now, and you could point your router at it and I could make my own TLDs and also redirect every query issued to google.com to somewhere else and there's nothing anyone could do to stop me (well, sort of, see next toot.)
There are standards bodies writing regulations and handing out domain names, and what have you, but those things only work because we allow them to.
Web standards work because everyone agrees that they'll use a web browser that implements them.
Remember browser prefixes in CSS? For a while, every web browser was scrambling to implement new features that other browsers didn't support and that hadn't been standardized yet, but people used them anyway (I did, certainly) and eventually those things were made in to standards.
We can use browsers that only implement a subset (or that actually implement a superset) of those standards. We can write web pages in such a way that we empower people to skip Google and Mozilla's browser duopoly.
It is within our ability to implement web services that do everything most people want out of the web and a web browser that can access all of those services, without needing anyone's blessing.
(And, a few years ago here on the fediverse, some punks did it! Project Gemini is still out there, still being used, still very cool. It is not what I would have built in the same space, and I bounce off of it when I try to use it seriously, but there are many things about it that I like a great deal.)
uk pol / the rerun of section 28
Tories decided to make school hostile to trans kids by refusing to allow them to use nicknames without parental permission and outing them to their parents, etc.
But then the election happened and the policy was never really clarified.
So bigots feel empowered and staff allies have no idea what support they're allowed to provide. I asked a researcher who specialises in education and trans kids what the current "best practice" is under the current regime and she's asking around. There is a total lack of clarity.
And this is just textbook fascism. People working in schools are ready to obey the rules, so they "obey in advance". They don't know what they should obey, so the error on the side of caution - of failing to protect children.
I do understand that it's scary and there are all kind of vague threats to future livelihood and freedom for allies. Nobody wants to be a martyr and being *the* court challenge is very stressful.
But it's worth recalling that **nobody** was every prosecuted for Section 28.
Protecting the dignity of vulnerable students is right and Labour's major concern is being embarrassed, so if we're clear that it will very much be embarrassing for them to push back, they won't. Be the ally that kids need.
I am once again thinking about helping to (loosely) organize some kind of online alternative to FOSDEM for those in FOSS who aren't comfortable attending a super-spreader event in the peak of Europe's flu season.
EDIT: there is now a blog post about it 👇
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.