I wonder what people use in #godotengine games to identify objects in *save files*. Not just the ID of instances, but what type they are. Some ID manually setup in resource? A name? Path of the scene? Name of a script? UUIDs? I believe most people don't really do anything involved, or even have a game with such needs.
But I make a plugin that needs to handle this, at scale. So I'm often running into this problem, and so far all options I considered have annoying downsides.
How 12,000 Tonnes of Dumped Orange Peel Grew Into a Landscape Nobody Expected to Find
‘"This is one of the only instances I've ever heard of where you can have cost-negative carbon sequestration," says ecologist Timothy Treuer from Princeton University.’
@afewbugs I like using old (or new from the poundshop) silicone baking trays or mats to make new seals for that sort of thing. They won't degrade like the rubber ones. Compass cutters are a very useful tool.
I just installed two CCTV cameras using seals cut from a baking tray that was too disgusting to cook with but perfect for making a seal or four.
This is why #ZeroWaste as an aesthetic, all those reels of someone in a perfect kitchen waving a Kilner jar allegedly containing a year's worth of waste, is nonsense. For a start the seals on Kilner jars eventually perish & if you don't want to be picking bits of orange rubber out of your muesli you need to replace them. This replacement came in a packet of 12 in 2 plastic bags (which I threw away before thinking to take the photo and don't really fancy fishing back out of the bin).
Ideological purity over user interests? ✅️
No understanding of why that ideology matters? ✅️
Enforcement of said ideology through pseudolegal rules that reward toxic dudebro behavior? ✅️
Yep, it's a GNU project.
#AskFedi: for those whose first computer experiences were with Windows 95/98 (or NT) and who look back on it fondly:
What would be needed to rekindle that early experience of wonder around computers and/or the internet? What stands out in your memory as the cause for that sense of wonder back then? (The answer to these two questions can be different!)
Dit is het tweeduizendnegenhonderdvierendertigste couplet van het potje met vet
Heb het potje potje potje ve-hè-hè-het al op de tafel gezet.
pandemic rhetoric
you really do have to wonder if the whole general idea of "strengthening your immune system" came out of the same toxic rhetoric that encourages toxic masculinity and nationalism, where you have to be stronger in its own right for no particular reason, and not just because of bad science
like, it seems pretty indisputable that, while it's pretty difficult to avoid all germs and you actually should not do that, exposure to the kinds of germs that make you sick is pretty much always worse than not
we have vaccines to get immunity now and getting sick "naturally" just opens you up to being miserable or worse, permanent damage, so, seems pretty bad
there are a lot of toxic men who feel like they can "tough out" an infection and that's simply not true. you can't fight a cold like you fight a bear, and like fighting a bear, you can easily just die
idk. feels like we need to particularly hone in on this rhetoric as being toxic, fascist nonsense instead of it being anything like fact
After hearing about Eric Schmidt's guest lecture in an AI class, I looked up the transcript, and yes he really did say that if a Silicon Valley entrepreneur were to "illegally steal everybody's music" they would just "hire a whole bunch of lawyers to go clean the mess up." Then I was curious and looked up the syllabus for the course and based on the topic schedule, the most explicit ethics topic seemed to be "opportunities and risks" for which the guest speaker was... Eric Schmidt. 😕
“What we sacrifice for automation”
https://www.fastcompany.com/90336550/how-much-are-we-sacrificing-for-automation
> If we don’t do it the way the machine is designed to process it, we yield our agency, over and over again to do it in a way that it can collect the data to get us the item we want, the service we need, or the reply we hope for. Humans yield. Machines do not yield back.
Also feels like this maps neatly onto "precision" in other disciplines (3D modelling, manufacturing, etc.) where working at higher precision gets you a more exact result but usually at increased cost elsewhere
Note that this is a philosophical classification much more than a technical one; many technical choices feed into how a language behaves, and the *intention* and underlying belief system of the designers are going to be the main determining factor here
Pondering whether it would make sense to classify programming languages on a "precision" axis, meaning where it sits on the axis of tradeoffs between "exactly (needing to) specify all the details of what you want it to do, resulting in guaranteed and predictable behaviours" and "doing hopefully-the-right-thing with little specification work, at the cost of less predictable behaviour and it sometimes guessing wrong"
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
Feel free to flirt, but if you want to actually meet up and/or do something with me, lewd or otherwise, please tell me explicitly or I won't realize :) I'm generally very open to that sort of thing!
Further boundaries: boosts are OK (including for lewd posts), DMs are open. But the devil doesn't need an advocate; I'm not interested in combative arguing in my mentions. I am however happy to explain things in-depth when asked non-combatively.
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.