Show newer

"Social media wasn’t web 2.0, it’s what *killed* Web 2.0!

You might think I’m arguing over mere nomenclature but the important fact is that this era existed, and the Web3 pitch pretends it didn’t. We already had decentralized internet with social features. This fact contradicts the story the Web3/blockchain advocates want to tell you, so their story skips this entire era."

Good post over here: accordion-druid.tumblr.com/pos

re: fighting fascist media, meta 

To make this absolutely clear: this is in no way a *justification* for people getting involved in right-wing movements. That remains the responsibility of those people themselves.

The point I am trying to make here (and asking a question about) is that sure, we know what is *morally* the correct answer, but how does this translate into concrete actions to stop the issue from happening?

Show thread

fighting fascist media, meta 

I quite often have warned someone about a platform that's clearly targeting white supremacists, nazis, and other kinds of fascists as their userbase, but that superficially claims they're just "neutral".

These warnings rarely lead anyone to leave those platforms behind. And it usually takes a few years before it becomes publicly documented and accepted that yes, it really is a fascist platform.

On the one hand, the conclusion you could draw from this is that they should have listened to the warning, they should have taken it seriously. "I told you so" and all that.

You might argue that they probably understood perfectly well what it was, but they were actually okay with it as long as it wasn't too obvious, because a little bit of white supremacy helps them feel better as a white guy, and really the problem isn't that they ignored the warning, but that they are racist. And you'd probably be right.

But then the question becomes: how can we prevent this dynamic? Because however wrong and racist someone may be, that conclusion does not change the outcome of them likely having become radicalized further right in this process. How can we avoid that happening?

How do we stop "people who have internalized racist views and never introspected on them" from walking into the just-about-tolerable bar and falling into a fascist pit? Because yes, it's their own responsibility if they do so, but the consequences are borne by everyone else and that's still a problem.

I just realized a good argument against computer ads.

Contrary to regular ads, it is actually using your resources (your power, time on the CPU you bought, etc)

So, shouldn't ad companies paying you money for displaying their ads? Like they pay billboard owners or news paper owners, etc.

So until then, using ad block is just preventing theft.

I really need a home 🏡

Can someone please help me? I’m being #neglected & #abused
All you need is a spare room & a heart. Ask anyone you know.

Domestic violence orgs don’t help #disabled people. I need someone to take me in. I just need a quiet room.

I need to be safe with care. Please help.

#MEAwarenessHour #MECFS #pWME #PWLC #LongCovid #ChronicIllness

#Melbourne #Australia

@mecfs @disabilityjustice @disability @chronicillness @neisvoid @socialwork
@multipledisabilities
@longcovid

Kent iemand nog goede artikelen (liever geen boeken i.v.m. lengte) over de geschiedenis van de verzuiling in Nederland, die het vanuit een zuiver perspectief bekijken (dus de positieve én de negatieve aspecten), en niet alleen maar het gebruikelijke "och jee die verschrikkelijke verzuiling, gelukkig zijn we nu modern"-gedoe?

GGZ, soort van, maar positief? 

Gisteren kwam ik achter het bestaan van de Yes We Can Clinics, door een paar jongeren die me erover vertelden, en die er bijzonder positief over waren - dat ben ik niet bepaald gewend van GGZ-instellingen, dus mijn interesse was gewekt.

Even verder gelezen, en het behandelprogramma en de aanpak zien er echt heel goed uit, ze lijken het echt te begrijpen (ook waarom de bestaande GGZ niet werkt). Ook even gezocht of het niet weer e.o.a. dubieuze Scientology-tak is, maar dat lijkt niet zo te zijn.

Is iemand hier er bekend mee? Is er nu echt een GGZ-instelling die het *wel* snapt? Het is moeilijk te geloven. :boost_requested:

context re: originally a subtoot, but really a general frustration on fedi and elsewhere 

This would originally have been a subtoot, but it seemed more constructive to point out the broader pattern, rather than highlighting the one instance I just happened to run into.

It would help nobody to treat this as an isolated case.

Show thread

originally a subtoot, but really a general frustration on fedi and elsewhere 

Toxic behaviour patterns don't become any less toxic just because they're attached to the (technically, morally, otherwise) "right" views.

This is something I particularly see with programmer folks insisting that they don't personally need a thing X, and therefore nobody should need a thing X. The exact value of "X" doesn't really matter.

("Windows" is probably one of the most common ones on here, but not the only one)

If you're trying to detach from toxic programmer communities - which is commendable! - then please also unlearn the toxic *behaviours*, not just the toxic *views*.

De 'Seepje'-zeep is blijkbaar gemaakt van sapindus-schillen uit Nepal. Dan vraag ik me toch af hoe 'duurzaam' dat precies is, het lijkt me toch niet dat er een tekort aan lokaal verkrijgbare zeep-ingredienten is...

If the attraction list on the site is accurate, this year's funfair here is not going to be very interesting...

Ever wondered how those corporate invoice scams work, where companies are tricked into paying bullshit invoices for services they've never purchased? Well, I just received one of those, so let's look at it!

Okay so this is awkward but it took me almost a year after taking it and many months of #trainspotting to notice that in the photo I've been using for the longest time as my profile banner, the arrangement of couches is weird!

It's Twindexx couches mixed with Pesa Sundeck couches in one train – pretty eyebrow-rising thing

But yeah, these are apparently interoperable to some extent and it just works

For context Koleje Mazowieckie is the only Polish carrier running double-deckers, they use both Sundecks and Twindexxes

Control car at the end of the train has to match the locomotive used: it's Pesa Gama for Sundecks and Traxx for Twindexxes

Cool!

When a tech co says it won't increase transparency or roll out safety features because that might threaten their market share, that's not "reasonable". In the long term, arrogance like that risks leading to orbital bombardment by anti-trust regulators with crowds cheering each new crater as it erupts

As a Blind person i never thought i would be on social media savoring photos. But the communal Mastodon alt text game is so strong that sweet, poetic or silly descriptions abound on my timeline. Thanks to legions of people who take time to write a meaningful description of the ephemera they post, i learn so much about insects, plants, buildings, memes — all dispatches from a dimension of the world that i otherwise wouldn't experience. If you're wondering whether anybody reads these things: YES.

:boost_ok:​ Hey, fediverse friends!

I want to remove the shroud of secrecy from a project I've been hacking on off-and-on for quite a while now.

It's a fediverse app for posting about things - in the first iteration, video games, but eventually lots more stuff.

Obviously you can already post about video games on mastodon or whatever, but the point is that each game can be a first-class object that you can reference and share across the fediverse, like with Bookwyrm or NeoDB.

I also wanted to experiment with different ways of federating posts, managing visibility/privacy, etc.

Current status:
All the big pieces are there and work, but lots of things are rough and/or clunky. It's definitely a 0.0.1 instead of a 1.0, but I set myself a deadline of sharing it this summer, otherwise I'll just trap myself in an endless cycle of quietly tweaking this software that nobody uses but me and never actually sharing it.

I've been using it for gameposting for a while now (almost 2000 posts already!) - it's absolutely not ready for General Consumption, but if you're willing to put up with some code and some jank, it might be worth a look for you.

codeberg.org/gush/gush

gush.social/

#gush

I love how the national library of medicine went with "do not @ us we are a library" for their default embed preview image for everything on pubmed lmao

I am really pleased with this photo. Straight off the camera and it looks SO WEIRD. So many questions. Why such a HUGE arched bridge over what appears to be such a small distance? Why only one solitary pedestrian using it? Where are they going? Where have they been?

I love it.

#photography #Scotland #bridge

I realized recently that
1. I'm about to install a little library in front of my house, and
2. I have a laser printer, which means my cost to print simple black and white booklets basically rounds down to 0$
So, uh, any interesting free-to-print (ideally black and white) #zines out there that would be interesting to share with the general public? Especially those related to #solarpunk, community, #anarchism, #environmentalism and similar subjects. Bonus points if they're in French

"After careful consideration, we have decided to proceed with other candidates whose qualifications more closely align with the specific needs of the role at this time" :boost_ok: 

A lot of people are looking for a job right now, and I've seen many of them on fedi taking the automated messages from recruiters at face value and questioning why exactly are they not a good fit for this role. Especially when the role still stays open for a while.

The rejections come in multitude of different wordings.
"You already possess a lot of important skills for this position but unfortunately, we have other candidates who are a closer match overall."
"Although your background is impressive, we regret to inform you that we have decided to pursue other candidates for the position at this time. At this stage, we have decided to move forward with candidates that have more experience as fullstack developers and more experience with our tech stack."
"Even though your profile seems very exciting, we decided to shortlist other candidates who match our qualification profile for the advertised job even better."

This all is bullshit.

All these texts are just a part of a standard template not even for rejection; the messages that you're getting are the messages sent automatically after recruiter clicks on "end the process for this candidate" button.
They're not even sent at that moment; instead, often they're sent by a cron job that fires, say, precisely at 8:00 on every day Mon-Fri (even when that's a public holiday) and send rejection messages to all the candidates who are no longer in hiring process but didn't receive the rejection message yet.

I've had a couple of recruiters later telling me this explicitly (when the rejection with this reason just didn't make any sense not just because of my profile).

And on this screenshot, the most recent case in point.
This company felt that I match their requirements very closely. So closely, that I passed all five interview stages successfully and they made me a job offer.
For reasons outside the scope of this post, the conditions the offer came with really didn't suit me. We discussed this for a few more days, they decided that they won't compromise on these conditions, and gave me time to think if I'm going to accept their offer.
I thought about it for a few days and eventually had to reject the offer. They personally thanked me for the information, wished me good luck... and the next day, exactly at 8:00, I'm getting this automated message. It's beyond ridiculous.

So whenever you get a bullshit message telling you that your profile is very exciting but they decided to move forward with other candidates whose profiles are even more exciting but you should not hesitate and please contact them whenever there is another role... it's just a very elaborate way of saying "your application process for this role is over". It doesn't mean that they found your profile exciting, or that they even looked at your profile. It doesn't mean that profiles of other candidates are now exciting, or that there even are any other candidates. It doesn't mean that they rejected you because you're not a good fit, or that they rejected you at all (as opposed to, say, you rejecting them, or them restructuring the company and cancelling the job opening). It doesn't mean that they want you to apply to them in the future. It only means one thing: that you won't be getting the job you applied to, period. Nothing more.

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.