Reason Studios accomplished something incredible, finally make an FM synthesizer feel simple, intuitive and fun to use, roughly 40 years after the first commercial FM synth.
There's no way this would have been so readable without the skeuomorphism aspect.
It’s a pretty important point: if as a rail firm you provide enough accurate digital information you’ll reduce how often passengers ask staff what’s going on
And given pretty much every railway has a *staff shortage* it’s worth getting this right!
(And sure other railways have poor data quality, but at least they *try*. I’m not sure Eurostar is even trying here)
And if you do accomplice things long enough and stay committed, you eventually realize that eating this kind of shit pales in comparison to what the people you're accomplicing for are experiencing from non avccomplices every day.
So the question is, when you reach a breaking point, where do you jump? I think good people withdraw to recuperate and then return to the work. I think others let it turn them bitter and let it estrange them.
But if you are committed to being a true accomplice you must find a way to handle the challenges, handle the idea that random strangers will dislike you and distrust you for trying to support them. And be okay with that. Partly because it's just going to happen while you do the work, and partly because the supremacy depends on you getting alienated by that dynamic. So if you let it alienate you, then you are doing the work of the supremacy.
It's a real cusp. And it really defeats a lot of would be accomplices who try to use the fact of trying to do the work as an immunity against criticism or distrust.
Are you in it for your own reasons? Or do you have ulterior motives? I guess you'll find out.
2/2
I don't talk about this enough. And I do teach it when I teach antiracism and other social justice to white people or other people with culturally ingrained privilege/entitlement. But it's often a very hard earned lesson and successfully navigating it requires humility. Not just tacit humility but full note humility that is very difficult for many people to volunteer.
The lesson? It's that being an accomplice means randomly eating shit. If you do accomplice things, you will, probably frequently, experience stuff that your privilege demands retribution for, and that you must suppress that desire for doing.
It's because of trauma. The people you are accomplicing for are deeply traumatized. Your people made them that way. Constant self-regulating micro and macro aggression, perpetrated by you and your ancestors are the cause. So you literally cannot be trusted. Even if you show constant good faith through every test, even if 100% of the time you've faced adversity you've chosen the right, just path, there will be people who don't trust you and think you're the enemy, just looking at you. And despite what your privilege demands, that you make them understand you, you cannot. It would only make things worse.
1/
Linux is a bit shit sometimes,
There's your headline. I don't care whether you use linux or not; ten years ago that might have mattered, I might be trying to get more people to use it so that adobe or whoever would put more effort into supporting it, but that doesn't really matter anymore, these days everything either Just Works or there's a native equivalent that's better and I've no selfish reason to recommend linux anymore, so if you're happy with windows stick with windows.
If you're *not* happy with windows, here's the other half of that sentence at the top of this post:
Linux is a bit shit sometimes - but when it's a bit shit, it's a bit shit in the way of a cat who watches the mouse run across the living room floor, not in the way of a cat who suddenly decides to bite you for no reason. It's not *actively malicious,* it's just a bit shit sometimes, which these days is tbh pretty damn good compared with a lot of stuff.
Like, it's not bad because it's being hollowed out for investors, it's not bad because it's spying on you to make more money, it's not bad because its makers know you've gotta take it anyway, it's not bad because it knows it can get a lot worse before you look elsewhere, it's just... bad. But bad in like a normal way, like a bike with a wonky gear shifter and tyres that keep going soft, not like a bike that shows you adverts.
There's my linux recommendation.
LINUX: It's A Bit Shit Sometimes™
One more post about Linux and then I'll shut up about it.
(I can do that, because I outgrew the evangelical "Oh my god you have to try this it's so much easier" stage like ten years ago, it's possible for me to shut up about Linux now, which is nicer for everyone involved)
If you have to choose between something that used to be crap but is slowly getting better, and something that used to be alright but is getting inexorably worse, the best time to jump is gonna be when you get to see and take joy in the getting-better bit.
If you leave it too long and the thing you're jumping from has gotten intolerably, unusably bad, you'll be in a hell of a panic and it'll probably be at a super-inconvenient time. Give the New Thing a good sniff ahead of time and play around with it a bit in a non-vital setting, so that you're not moving in a horrible panicked rush.
(This is true even - or maybe *especially* - when they publish some seemingly in-depth analysis of something. Notice how certain connections are suspiciously underdefined, and how the whole thing looks a lot like "finding patterns because they are expected to exist".)
+1 I see very few women cycling alone https://bikepacking.com/plog/man-or-bear-debate/
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
Feel free to flirt, but if you want to actually meet up and/or do something with me, lewd or otherwise, please tell me explicitly or I won't realize :) I'm generally very open to that sort of thing!
Further boundaries: boosts are OK (including for lewd posts), DMs are open. But the devil doesn't need an advocate; I'm not interested in combative arguing in my mentions. I am however happy to explain things in-depth when asked non-combatively.
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.