institutional abuse, neurodivergence, prisons
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-67663128
"Arion Kurtaj from Oxford, who is autistic, was a key member of international gang Lapsus$. [...] He will remain at a secure hospital for life unless doctors deem him no longer a danger. The court heard that Kurtaj had been violent while in custody with dozens of reports of injury or property damage."
What the actual fuck??
Like, to be absolutely clear, "secure hospital" means "prison". It is not primarily a place of care, but one of isolation.
Substack takes
Reading all these Substack takes and I’m just like
This is the result of the ongoing American naiveté around speech and the way it uses its position to imperialistically force that naiveté onto the rest of us
Why are you all so surprised at this outcome continuing to be what happens
This is what you get when you have a bad underlying understanding of speech
Unless you're a government body, I don't want to hear any fucking bullshit about "free speech" from you.
If you're a corporation or community organisation I want to hear what you stand for. I want to hear where you will draw lines and what values you think are expendable in the pursuit of success.
Plant a flag. Show me who you are. Don't give me this centrist fuckery about how it's important to be balanced, when you're not the only game in town. None of this internet bullshit is indispensable.
Stand for something. It might work better than you think.
#Introduction We're the University of #Groningen #Library - Universiteitsbibliotheek Groningen! 🎓📖
We moved here from https://akademienl.social/@Bibliothecaris, our first home in the Fediverse.
bad tech vibes
more bad vibes from Helix, a modal text editor written in Rust:
https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/issues/5520
they have not developed any kind of proper keyboard layout remapping, which excludes people who have literally anything besides a QWERTY keyboard layout, used mostly by those in English-speaking countries
I point out that this is a hard blocker for people using the editor, and that there's an existing solution that's been sitting around for over a year that has been ignored. instead, I get called entitled for asking for more features when the project is run by volunteers
like… I fucking hate when tech people advertise their projects as revolutionary fucking shit and try and entice more people to use it, and then act like calling them out for accessibility issues is as bad as calling them out for not designing things exactly the way some rando wants without them doing the work
like… there's a difference between a software project, and a community. and these people sure as hell don't know how to run a community, despite advertising it like they're building one
what Substack is, snark edition
@joepie91 @researchfairy i like the notion of referring to companies by what year they got funding so you can tell how close they are to flipping
I didn't specify, but this was a journalistic pitch about some sketchy stuff #FossilFuel companies are doing in the area I live. I guess I should be neutral to the industry that's waged a half-century information war against the public and intimidated journalists & activists 🙄
If anyone knows of publications / editors that are more in alignment with #MovementJournalism and cover #Climate issues, let me know.
About Movement #Journalism:
https://rjionline.org/reporting/what-does-movement-journalism-mean-for-journalism-as-a-whole/
and
https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/V/bo29172094.html
Just got a pitch rejected because I'm an "activist"
Things that have required "activism" in recent years:
- believing that reproductive rights are human rights
- believing that civil rights are... good
- believing that Palestinians and LGBTQ folks are human
- believing that judges should be held to a standard of ethics
- believing that destroying our only livable environment is bad
So they want to filter out any people who act on these beliefs, bc everyone else is unfit to inform the public.
capitalist realism & the fediverse
like now it's become clear to me that the issue with the fediverse and its understanding isn't really about onboarding, Mastodon development being shit, or anything like that
it's about capitalist realism
people literally cannot comprehend social media being in any other shape than that of Twitter
and so people will propose literally contradictory solutions, like that we should have a government-run public good for "socialmedia.gov" while simultaneously breaking up big social media sites so they compete
we can't simultaneously have one social media site, and several competing social media sites, and have those all be the same thing
basically, whenever people propose a replacement, they think of the fediverse, where you can post on Twitter and be seen on Threads. maybe a government-run social media is also available for anyone to join. but in their heads, each one of these "social media platforms" has to be competing to Become Twitter, and the only thing stopping them is this mysterious market force of competition, or the invisible hand of the government, or whatever
that's literally capitalist realism
this idea that no possible economic system can exist besides capitalism. it's this idea that infects everyone's minds when they try to think of a better world. it's so hard to imagine what the world would look like without capitalism, and this is just an example of it
the idea of a "social media site" being run by anyone besides some minority of "weird" people isolated in their own little groups is not only foreign, but categorically impossible in these people's minds
and that's the issue with the fediverse for a lot of people. their vision of social media involves this rugged individualism of everyone going to the marketplace of social media and choosing the one that offers them the best value, rather than there just being a bunch of communities around and they have to actually socially interact with people and become a part of one
and with that in mind, I feel like completely redoing my approach to explaining this, starting with capitalist realism. people genuinely can't see social media as anything besides Twitter-shaped, and unpacking that first is what's necessary to get people on board
The most frustrating part is, it's so easy to say "take that shit somewhere else" when you run a bar or a website or any other group. That's literally your job when you create a space like that. I've seen people do it. I've done it. It's so fucking easy. You just go, "get out." And then they do. They have to. It's your place!
Anyone who says it's not easy is lying, and it's usually because they don't want it taken someplace else. They like it right where it is.
People who say they don’t like nazis, but turn around and take money from nazis, and give money to nazis, do in fact like nazis.
#Substack
You can tell Privacy Badger was designed for websites chock full of trackers, because instead of saying “no trackers found”, it says “no trackers blocked”. I think that alone is a stunning indictment of the contemporary web.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.