Show newer

"Een tweetal nieuwe stukken over de massademonstraties van de jaren ’10. We zijn het niet per se eens met alle uitspraken en conclusies in de artikelen, zoals over de mogelijke noodzaak van hiërarchie. Maar we delen wel de algemene lijn ervan: dat opstanden alleen revoluties kunnen worden als er een duidelijk idee achter zit en ze goed georganiseerd zijn."

De massademonstraties uit de jaren ’10 en de misgelopen revoluties
doorbraak.eu/de-massademonstra

Nordic model 

@babe A practical example for those struggling:

Pimping is illegal under the nordic model. A pimp can be any third party who makes a profit off a sex worker – so norwegian police would target landlords, force them to evict sex worker tenants or be charged as pimps.

This was literally called "Operation Homeless". Do not delude yourself for even a second that this was in any way for sex workers' benefit.

Nordic model 

The nordic model is a way of criminalising sex work 'without' criminalising the sex worker.

Instead the idea is to target the clients of sex workers as criminal to decrease demand.

When people's actions are criminalised it drives sex work further underground and increases the risk enormously to sex workers.

A lot of mitigating safety practices are also commonly criminalised in tandem, so the "not" criminalising goes out the window fast. hrw.org/news/2019/08/07/why-se

Show thread

Market segmentation is just inconvenient progressive taxation with complicated extra steps

Chiropractic PSA 

Never let a "chiropractor" touch your body.

... but given the sheer amount of ad fuckery going on on that site, I assume that all the developers probably only visit it with an adblocker...

Show thread

I wonder if 1337x has realized yet that one of their ad providers broke the comments tab

basically there are so many examples of bullshit racism in maths history but I will always mention the chinese remainder theorem as the titular example because it's very often used and very clearly racist

we know the exact book they got it from and its author but we still just say it's "chinese"

the guy who did this was a missionary, btw. because of fucking course he was

PSA: wifi antennas 

- Bigger is not better. A wifi antenna on a router is internally just a stick of wire that's a *specific length* for a particular frequency. Plastic over-moldings styled like evangelions are just there to look cool.

- Antennas might advertise themselves as "+3.6dB gain" or whatever, but that's a measurement of directionality, not efficiency or power. (Properly the unit is dBi, or "decibels over isotropic".) Unless you specifically desire a directional antenna, you rarely want a higher figure there.

- The relevant measure of antenna efficiency is VSWR (voltage standing wave ratio) or s11 (return loss). These are both different ways of expressing how well an antenna is matched to a specific frequency of interest. For VSWR, 1.0 is ideal and larger numbers are worse. For s11, numbers that are more negative are better. Consumer hardware rarely indicates those specs tho.

it seems like techbros think "infosec" means "it's okay to access personal information without consent, so long as i'm using a TLS connection to read it."

politiegeweld, taser 

"De man bleek nog een boete open te hebben staan en kon die niet betalen. De agent wilde daarom zijn autosleutels omdat hij zijn auto niet mocht gebruiken totdat de boete betaald is. De man weigerde die sleutels af te geven. Ook toen de agent zei dat hij dan aangehouden zou worden. De man bleef zitten in zijn auto. Toegeschoten assistentie moest een stroomstootwapen inzetten om de man alsnog aan te houden."

(Bron: omroepbrabant.nl/nieuws/438837)

Wat was dat ook alweer over hoe een taser alleen als vervanging voor een pistool gebruikt zou worden, en niet tot toegenomen inzet daarbuiten zou leiden?

Moet ik daaruit afleiden dat een agent iemand neergeschoten zou hebben om z'n autosleutels te stelen?

*proprietary software shoves ads in your face, implements dark patterns everywhere and does everything to keep your attention*
"Well, but it's free to use and everyone uses it. It's not that bad."

open source software shows a sidebar on the right instead of left side
"Literally unusable garbage."

Do any IP experts know if there are any copyright problems if I publish something on the Fedi and somebody else takes it and displays it somewhere else with ads? Is that, in US legal terms, "fair use"?

Is there a way to flag my posts as CC-NC or prevent people from using them commercially?

Also: this COVID safety presentation is maybe the best I've ever seen.

It's a fairly comprehensive guide for people who aren't as into the research as we are, and has none of the bad/false info you get from public health sources.

If we could replace every public health COVID guide with this, it would be a huge improvement.

cc @CovidSafeFurs

covidsafefurs.org/Covid%20Safe

also fediverse meta 

it's telling that in all the discussion of Threads federating with activitypub I've yet to see any "but will Threads implement CWs?" or "Threads users will never respect our use of CWs" toots, which are generally the low hanging fruit of fedimeta when discussing a new integration.

that's because this isn't just another new integration. this is a breakpoint.

@CaribenxMarciaX mmhmm, I'm seeing a lot of such takes and it's disconcerting to see how little people have apparently learned from years and years of exploitative tech companies doing their thing: and how little work the tech companies have to do in PR terms, because people are going round doing the work for them, FOR FREE

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.