Sven Slootweg (soft-deprecated) @joepie91@pixie.town
- Future new account
- @joepie91@slightly.tech
- Matrix
- @joepie91:pixie.town
- Pronouns
- they/them, he/him, whatever, it's not like I have any idea either 🙃
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.
Joined Aug 2019
Sven Slootweg (soft-deprecated)
boosted
The provider with the best coverage in Germany is called “Kein Netz”, apparently
re: subtoot
Of course it ended up just being the usual rant about how control over moderation should rest with the users while conveniently not mentioning abuse considerations, not any actually interesting take about EEE or anything
subtoot
Just ran across an (older) comment that claims something to the effect of "defederation should be removed from the protocol because it makes it too easy to centralize the network, just look at what happened to XMPP", and I think I need a new brain now
Page reload seems to have fixed it 🙃
Sven Slootweg (soft-deprecated)
boosted
ARGH
What's a good website for hosting, and writing, stories? I like Word but also want people to be able to like, leave editing suggestions and critique, ideally ON the text of the page they're reading. Google Docs COULD work but doesn't have a side-by-side view which is... I mean *why.*
Oh hey, the bug is back where a different post gets boosted from the one I clicked 'boost' on
(This extra applies to Dutch folks; no, we do not have a consensus culture, we have a compromise culture, and that's why we're dealing with a fascism problem now)
Compromise: finding a middle ground between existing solutions, nobody gets exactly what they want
Consensus: identifying the root cause of the disagreement, and determining a (potentially novel) solution that meets everyone's needs fully
Know the difference :)
Sven Slootweg (soft-deprecated)
boosted
Web Platform Baseline, recently re-announced by Google Chrome, does not consider browser support for #accessibility features built into the web platform.
Accessibility is a fundamental requirement for devs (legal compliance, contracts). Yet Web Platform Baseline does not actually cover baseline support.
https://adrianroselli.com/2023/12/baseline-does-not-really-cover-baseline-support.html
Moderation litmus test: in a moderation dispute, do you give the benefit of the doubt to the offender, or to the person who has been harmed?
Sven Slootweg (soft-deprecated)
boosted
This might be one of the most horrible hacks I've heard about in a while.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38661103
(h/t @bluecmd)
Sven Slootweg (soft-deprecated)
boosted
Sven Slootweg (soft-deprecated)
boosted
any restaurant where you might have to wait a decent amount for your server or food should do the paper tablecloth + crayons thing
Sven Slootweg (soft-deprecated)
boosted
Come to think of it, why *doesn't* the Contributor Covenant say anything about consent or respecting boundaries?
Come to think of it, why *doesn't* the Contributor Covenant say anything about consent or respecting boundaries?
Absolutely fucking sick of techbros and their non-existent understanding of consent and constant overconfidence
Sven Slootweg (soft-deprecated)
boosted
A reason to block "reply guys" (of whatever gender) who follow you vs. just muting them or toughing it out because you don't feel like you deserve better: Because they may do the same thing to the people you boost.
This is something folks like me with a (too) high follower count should especially be aware of, but it could happen with anyone. So if not blocking them for your own mental health, consider that you don't want people you boost to experience this.
Sven Slootweg (soft-deprecated)
boosted
Here's how the "Ship of Theseus" page looked in July 2003 when it was first created! Since then, the article has been edited 1792 times. 0% of its original phrases remain.
- Future new account
- @joepie91@slightly.tech
- Matrix
- @joepie91:pixie.town
- Pronouns
- they/them, he/him, whatever, it's not like I have any idea either 🙃
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.
Joined Aug 2019
