»Masking is not ‘living in fear’, it's being smart to avoid damage to your health from a deadly disease. It also protects others, which we should all be doing.«
#CovidIsNotOver #COVIDisAirborne #KeepMasksInHealthCare #covid #covid19 #WearAMask #maskup @novid
Ik vind dit toch wel een beetje triest, hoor. Dan ben je een treinbedrijf, en nodig je mensen uit om mee te doen aan je onderzoek... en dan verwacht je dat ze hun eigen vervoer gaan betalen... en de vergoeding is ook al niet om over naar huis te schrijven. #NS
the funniest thing about Apple is the last version of MacOS features "video reactions" where if your camera sees you do a thumbs up or heart symbol with your hands, stuff happens behind you like fireworks in ANY video app you are using BY DEFAULT.
A friend was in an online therapy session, describing his trauma so the therapist asked if he was alright and he did a thumbs up and then HUGE FIREWORKS BEHIND HIS HEAD.
It's so bad that online therapy sessions now start with a warning dialog!
This is going to be unpopular.
I keep seeing people say they're shocked how anti-Indigenous Australia is, and when I go look at their profiles they all have "leftist" written.
You all need to understand what this means for how your leftism is tied in to white supremacy.
If you're shocked to find out that a colonised country is racist, you haven't been listening.
If your leftist selves haven't been listening to Indigenous people on this Stolen Land, you're leaning into white supremacy.
#Aboriginal #Indigenous #Decolonise #SovereigntyNeverCeded #Treaty #FuckRacism #FuckWhiteness #FuckColonisation
You know, without Web3 NFT bullshit, there was a lost era of decentralized gaming back when it wasn't cost effective to have massive servers for users. Old games which used the host/join system. Hell, just games where one client in a LAN also acted as the server computer. I get it, it's just easier to run all your online interactions through Nintendo, but like... Those old games can still go online, whereas everything else just died. That's sad and we should make that a consideration again.
Palestine, Israel, propaganda, bias, violence, demographics
the violent politics and rhetorics at the center of this conflict. A country and government that has seemingly thrown in entirely with the hard-line right wing, violent government of Israel. So maybe it is on me to have some opinion.
Watching mostly from the deep sidelines, though, I have to say that my white, Jewish and (Asian) model minority type friends, when they take sides, are largely moving in harmony with the hard-line, violent Israeli government, sending support, prayers, and contributions solely to Jews and Israeli Jews and refusing any complicity with any context that got us to this point.
And in contrast, my friends who are Muslims, or who are BIPOC, who are Palestinian, who fight fascism at home and abroad, who dedicate themselves to humanitarian causes, who fight police fascism and white supremacy, are calling for ceasefire, diplomatic solutions, and sending aid and donations to organizations that support Israeli and Palestinian people, that try to dismantle the propaganda machine that is radicalizing us toward violent and dehumanizing responses to the current terror attacks.
3/
@checkervest There's an old medieval castle in the center of Ghent, the Gravensteen. In 1949 it had been sitting basically abandoned for a while. A bunch of university students, ostensibly protesting for cheaper beer, walked in with a few kegs of beer, locked the door behind them and held the castle for two hours while throwing rotten fruit at the cops trying to scale the walls with ladders.
This event is commemorated in a by now traditional student song and celebrated in the Gravensteen every year by Ghentish student organisations.
What's more, some hero managed to film this, in 1949!
https://www.ugentmemorie.be/sites/default/files/GRAVENSTEENBEZETTING_Universiteitsarchief%20Gent%20-%20compressed_1.mp4
we produce enough food, globally, to feed everyone.
there is enough housing built to house everyone. there are enough construction supplies and equipment for any additional housing needed to be built in short order.
medicines and medical equipment have never been easier to produce in mass quantity than they have ever been before in world history.
so why do we not ensure that everyone is fed, housed, and given sufficient medical care for their needs?
re: advice to beginning activists
Another way to think about this: if they truly intended to be helpful, they would be asking you what they could do to help, not just telling you what to do.
"This “moral calm”—a sort of manufactured consent—impedes risk mitigation by promoting the underestimation of a threat. Soothing public messaging during disasters can often lead to an increased death toll: Tragically, false reassurance contributed to mortality in both the attacks on the World Trade Center and the sinking of the Titanic."
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/covid-pandemic-panic-calm-advice/
re: advice to beginning activists
@joepie91 This also applies to people who agree with your point.
I've heard "I disagree with you and you're not going to convince me" but also "I agree with you but you're not going to convince other people".
Turns out we did in fact convince enough people to make a difference.
For anyone else reading along not knowing my specific context, I've been on the A12 a bunch of times, and then this happened: https://nos.nl/artikel/2493572-xr-stopt-acties-a12-kamermeerderheid-voor-motie-afbouwen-fossiele-subsidie
advice to beginning activists
You are probably going to run into a lot of people who tell you that your tactics/arguments/whatever do not convince them, and maybe they'll even tell you some specific way in which you should do it differently.
Don't waste your time on these people.
With that, I don't mean that you shouldn't develop an insight into the concerns of the broader population - you should *especially* learn about the concerns of people who are not in your direct social circles, because tunnel vision is a very real thing.
What I mean is that *these specific people* are not trying to be helpful - they are being *entitled*. They are defining (their perception of) your success by whether you are catering to *them, specifically, individually*. And they have already made up their mind that they don't agree with you, no matter what you do.
They are not activists, and even if they may have some notion of concerns among their social circles, they do not have the expertise in activism to turn that into the right solutions and tactics. They are not qualified advisors.
And usually you'll find that whatever tactic or argument they propose, it's something that allows them to more easily dismiss it - a tactic that is less disruptive, an argument that is a "compromise". Because they were never trying to help you make your activism a success; they were just trying to get rid of something that bothered them.
Activism is *supposed* to bother people - that is how things get changed. And contrary to apparently popular belief, it doesn't work by rationally convincing people (if only it were that easy...); it's a long-term process that involves steering public discourse, emotional responses, and so on. Often in ways that seem ineffective or counterproductive at first, but that have far-reaching and difficult-to-measure long-term effects.
You should of course find the tactics that work best for your cause; there is no universally effective strategy. But resist the temptation to follow the guidance of the least qualified and least engaged people in the room, however helpful it may sound on the surface.
Learn from experienced activists instead, inside and outside of your own cause.
Wooooooh, the Async Functions in Traits (AFIT) FCP has completed which means they'll be available on stable soon! That means AFITs should be part of Rust 1.75, which will release in the last week of December.
criticizing activists
(This is the English version of https://social.pixie.town/@joepie91/111227961313694045)
After 10+ years of constant complaining about activists, I'm very much done with this, and my patience for it is running lower by the day.
As an activist, whatever you do, it'll always be wrong - you're too violent, you're not violent enough. Everybody has an opinion about it, and they won't hesitate to voice it.
There is absolutely zero recognition that activism is a skill like any other, and that perhaps the people who have been doing it for years, might actually know what they're doing.
Instead, people who wouldn't recognize a protest if it hit them in the ass and certainly have never been involved in one, will lecture you about how "you won't accomplish anything this way".
You walk a protest march? "Nobody will give a shit anyway, you're just disrupting people's lives"
You go to court? "Hopeless, you're just wasting the time of the legal system"
You block a road? "You're just bothering innocent drivers, and creating dangerous situations"
You wreck shit? "You're violent, and you should go through the correct channels instead, go into politics"
You decide to go into politics? You'll be laughed out of the room, and constantly ridiculed about how "you can't possibly be expected to be taken seriously".
Well, what the fuck do you want then? How, exactly, do you think that problems are going to be solved? By yelling some shit from the sidelines, and hoping that the situation will magically change?
By relying on the "steady march of progress"? Which, by the way, is driven by activism?
If you're not willing to make a concrete contribution to activist campaigns, fine, but then *shut up*, do not meddle with them, and leave the job to the people who actually understand how activism works beyond gut feelings. Acknowledge that it is a skill, and it is not yours.
Take a step back, withhold comments and opinions, and instead amplify what activists are saying. Provide them with support in the manner that they request.
Or if you *do* want to get involved with activism, then that's also fine - but then you need to take the time and effort to understand why campaigns work how they do, why *activists* do what they do, and what the long-term effects of this might be that aren't immediately obvious to you.
kritiek op activisme
Na ruim 10 jaar constant geklaag tegenover activisten aan te moeten horen ben ik het intussen wel echt zat, en mijn geduld hiervoor begint steeds minder te worden.
Als activist kun je het nooit goed doen - dan ben je te gewelddadig, dan ben je niet gewelddadig genoeg. Iedereen heeft er een mening over en twijfelt niet om die te verkondigen.
Er is geen enkele erkenning dat activisme ook gewoon een specialisme is zoals ieder ander, en dat mensen die het al jaren doen misschien een idee hebben wat ze doen; nee hoor, de beste stuurlui staan aan wal, en iemand die in z'n leven nog nooit een demonstratie van dichtbij gezien heeft leest je gerust de les over hoe "je zo toch echt niets gaat bereiken".
Loop je een demonstratie, dan "gaat toch niemand zich daar iets van aantrekken, en je verstoort alleen maar de orde".
Begin je een juridisch proces, dan is het "kansloos en het rechtssysteem overbelasten met onzin, doe eens echt wat".
Blokkeer je een weg, dan "val je onschuldige automobilisten lastig en creeer je gevaarlijke situaties".
Sloop je dingen, dan "ben je gewelddadig en moet je het netjes proberen op te lossen door de politiek in te gaan".
Ga je de politiek in, dan wordt je weggezet als lachertje en als publieke schietschijf gebruikt want "dit kan je toch niet serieus nemen" (zie bijvoorbeeld de reacties op BIJ1).
Ja, wat wil je godverdomme nou? Hoe denk je, precies, dat problemen opgelost gaan worden? Door wat van de zijlijn te roepen en te hopen dat de situatie op magische wijze verandert? Door te vertrouwen op de "steady march of progress" (die overigens het gevolg is van, jawel, activisme)?
Als je niet bereid bent om concreet bij te dragen aan activistische campagnes, prima, maar bemoei je er dan ook niet mee en laat het over aan de mensen die het *wel* begrijpen voorbij het niveau 'onderbuikgevoel'. Erken dat het een specialisme is dat je niet hebt.
Neem een stap terug, onthoud je van eigen commentaar of mening, en leg de focus op wat activisten zelf zeggen. Ondersteun ze op de manier waar om gevraagd wordt.
Of als je *wel* bij activisme betrokken wilt raken, ook prima - maar neem dan ook de tijd en moeite om te begrijpen waarom campagnes werken zoals ze doen, waarom activisten doen wat ze doen, en hoe dat op de lange termijn effecten kan hebben die je niet direct voor ogen hebt.
re: kritiek op activisme
Late toevoeging: en zeker als je vaker kritiek hebt op de tactieken van activisten, dan op de dingen waartegen ze ageren, dan moet je je echt even achter de oren krabben over waar je mee bezig bent.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.