re: NixOS, the sponsorship thing, community safety
There sure is a lot of overlap between "people on this list" and "people who are involved in cryptocurrency stuff"
A problem with Twitter as the Nazi bar
I get it, the Nazi bar analogy for Twitter so incredibly appealing, for white people, and I personally left Twitter over a year ago. However if you use it to kick down? You're part of the fucking problem with this place.
If you can't recognize that the ability to leave Twitter is a Privilege? You're not really doing the work you need to do to understand structures of power and privilege, and how important community is for marginalized groups. And marginalized groups always build these community under fascism and oppression. It's not their fault if you haven't realized the problem until now.
Instead of punishing people who are still requiring to be present on Twitter to pay the bills, help them once they show up here.
Support their calls for help, commission art, etc etc etc.
Help facilitate the move, use your privilege to help people instead of just kicking down.
I just wish people would think more critically when it came to the Voice stuff, instead of pushing points without thinking.
Like, people keep saying that the Voice is an important step in the way to Treaty.. I'd invite you to think about it a little more and consider we have a good reason not to believe that (235 good reasons, tbh..).
Does the Australian government want Treaty?
-- if yes, why aren't they asking a referendum about it?
-- if yes, why aren't they clearly stating that they want Treaty?
-- if no, do you believe that they would institute a Voice as a step towards something they don't want?
-- if no, doesn't it make sense that the Voice is a set up so we stop pushing for Treaty?
It all comes back to what Audre Lorde warned - "the master's tools will never dismantle the master's house"
#VoiceToParliament #AusPol #Aboriginal #Indigenous #Decolonise #SovereigntyNeverCeded #Treaty #TreatyBeforeVoice
[If you're a settler, please don't comment. Just shush and have a think about it instead of taking space]
NixOS story time, community safety
Two years ago, there was a previous attempt by a couple of folks (I was one of them) to address lingering community safety issues in the #NixOS community. This came in the form of RFC 98: https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/98
The idea was that the NixOS community hadn't grown that big yet, so there was still a fair amount of room for setting up healthy governance structures.
RFC 98 proposed a participatory moderation model, with a rotating cast of moderators, and a moderation process that was based in consensus seeking and helping people understand the implications of what they say and do, preferring to resolve conflicts through mediation rather than punishment.
A number of privileged white dudes caused a huge fuss over this proposal. Why? Because it didn't specify *exactly* which things were and were not allowed (as this was meant to be a consensus-seeking thing); and they were convinced that it would be used to silence and/or censor people, even though the proposal explicitly stated otherwise.
(Cynically, I would say that they were afraid that there would be consequences for them overstepping their behaviour; something they could previously do with relative impunity, and free of the "risk of getting criticized".)
A competing proposal was put forth by someone else as a result, RFC 114, which introduced a 'traditional' code of conduct with specific disallowed things and no real provisions for problematic behaviour outside of those.
Crucially, whereas RFC 98 sought to *change* the shape of the community, to improve community safety... RFC 114 was meant to enshrine the *current* state of the community, not being particularly offensive to anyone currently involved in the project, and not excluding any of the existing behaviours.
RFC 98 was concern-trolled to death. The authors (very much marginalized folks) burned out. It was never passed, and neither was RFC 114. No formal support from project governance ever materialized.
And now an immigrant murder machine manufacturer has sponsored NixCon (sponsorship since thrown out, after public criticism), and this is being enthusiastically defended by people on the NixOS forums, who seem entirely comfortable in their defense.
Does this mean that the NixOS community is full of fascists? No. And there is a pretty large contingent of marginalized folks within the community!
But the reality is that community safety issues are not a new problem in NixOS, that the Anduril sponsorship was really not a free-standing incident, and that on a governance level, almost nothing is being done about it.
You shouldn't directly criticize people, because they might feel attacked. You shouldn't bring up community safety issues, because that's just unnecessary drama.
You shouldn't question which companies the community supports, because that's bringing politics into tech. You shouldn't point out that you feel unsafe, because you won't be taken seriously - surely you're exaggerating?
This is what tech people think constitutes a "reasonable" community.
A follow-up call to action: protect and guide the young people in your workplace. Point out the importance of rest, of not being a hero to cover for systemic failures beyond your pay grade, of getting paid for your time, of the cost of disability.
You may be the first person to let them know it's ok to ease off, or to have boundaries with work.
If not you, who?
I don't say this with any particular bitterness, more that this seems to be generally how it is, and you should know that your loyalty to your team and the people that employ you is just not worth the damage that you are doing to yourself, because that loyalty will not be there for you at the end of the process, and healing takes a surprising amount of time.
To put it in ecological terms, your health needs to be a sustainable resource for you. There is no safety net.
PSA: until you've experienced burnout, you are likely to underestimate how long it takes to recover. It's not a couple of months, it's 6-18 months for partial recovery, and maybe 3 years for full recovery (all depending on how bad it gets). The company burning you out will almost never support your recovery, mostly they'll drop you when you stop being productive.
Nobody in business cares about your health but you, so be your own advocate, or suffer the consequences.
re: NixOS, the sponsorship thing, community safety
Anyway I guess I need a "will not collaborate with these people" list for NixOS now
NixOS, the sponsorship thing, community safety
Too many people in the #NixOS community are comfortable with enthusiastically defending Murder Machines Inc., and too many other people just see that as a "difference in opinion" rather than being a direct threat to marginalized folks
I think you can probably guess which demographic this people belong to
@CaribenxMarciaX as usual i think it's a case of white people waking up to the fascism that's been there all along, and instructing others who've been dealing with it already for years how they should deal with it... i'm reminded of folks coming here for the first time in november last year and then writing articles about how to behave on mastodon; same fervent + misguided + patronizing energy of the privileged new convert
People who keep shouting it's unethical to be on Twitter now I have some fucking questions. You still buying at fast fashion outlets? Driving cars? Flying in airplanes? You eating Tyson Chicken? Do you try to keep slave labor out of your coffee? Or do you just not like evil when it feels a little too in your face?
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.