Woehoe, de kraak is geslaagd! De politie is langs geweest, heeft binnen gekeken, en heeft #JAN10 laten zitten. En het was er super gezellig langs de route van de Vierdaagse.
classism?, reading
I've always been really bothered by the whole rhetoric of "people are reading less, this will mean the collapse of society and culture!"
And I think the reason for that is the classism inherent in it; presenting it as if 'reading' is the only valid way to learn things, to communicate things, to "expand one's imagination" - reading, crucially that one mode of action that's beholden to the literate
NLSociety
Een zeer goede overpeinzing heeft Chris Keulemans hier opgeschreven, en ik herken het helaas in veel mensen terug. Het is soms best lastig progressief te blijven als je voordelen haalt uit de verworven positie in de maatschappij, daarom is het belangrijk om naar andere mensen die deze verworvenheden niet hebben te blijven luisteren en daar ook naar te handelen.
https://www.oneworld.nl/identiteit/mijn-linkse-generatiegenoten-glibberen-naar-rechts/
One of .art's rules is "Respect other users' boundaries.". This can be someone continuing to engage with you after you've asked them not to, disregarding a request you've made like 'no unsolicited advice', or it can be as simple as a stranger rocking up unannounced in your replies being rude.
The mods here are real people. Use the report feature, even if you're not sure, and forward reports to source instances. Even if it's something you're seeing as a third party, if it looks bad, report it.
You want ethical alternatives? Let’s build a campus where folks can work on them without worrying about how to exist day-to-day (or fund their early-stage development like VC does for surveillance capitalism).
The extent of what public funding is doing today is “Oh, looks like you’ve got some alternative functional, let’s pay you to add Feature X to it.”
Better than nothing?
Sure.
Best we can do?
Not by a longshot.
https://ar.al/2019/11/29/the-future-of-internet-regulation-at-the-european-parliament/
re: climate justice, violence
Also, to clarify: I do in fact believe that "no violence should exist at all".
The problem is that whenever people *say* that, without extra context and clauses, that's never what they actually *mean* - instead, what they mean is "no things *that I recognize as* violence should exist", which is something entirely different and not something I can stand behind.
re: climate justice, violence
That's only partly a rhetorical question, by the way. If someone has a legitimate argument, I'd be willing to hear it. But I'm skeptical of anything I've heard so far.
climate justice, violence
I am honestly finding pacifist stances regarding climate justice to be increasingly indefensible.
Like, I've never been a fan of pacifism in the sense of "nobody should be allowed to use violence ever", because "violence" is always defined in a suspiciously narrow manner that just so *happens* to benefit the established powers.
But like... we're getting *beyond* that point now. We're getting to a point where human-driven climate change is becoming so impactful and deadly that even the absolute worst hypothetical out-of-control 'mob rule' (the one that never happens but that people are always afraid of) couldn't possibly match the scale of violence and death in climate change.
When even the absolute worst case of violent resistance is less deadly and less impactful than *not* doing so... how can you possibly continue to argue for 'peaceful' resistance, by any reasonable standard of ethics?
And like, burning down polluting infrastructure will stop its pollution, the practical effect is not in question. This whole discussion is purely about ethical considerations and harm reduction.
So like, what's the remaining argument for 'peaceful' resistance, then? Because I'm not seeing it.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.