"How to Fight Digital Colonialism" notes cont'd
"This worrying picture has led several scholars and activists—among them Sareeta Amrute, Nanjala Nyabola, Paola Ricaurte, Abeba Birhane, Michael Kwet, and Renata Avila—to characterize Big Tech’s global impact as a form of digital colonialism. On this view, primarily U.S.-based tech corporations function in many ways like former colonial powers. Driven by an expansionist ideology, these companies arrange digital infrastructures to fit their economic needs on a global scale. They contribute to the exploitation of low-wage, marginalized workers across the globe. They extract truly staggering profits with very little accountability and with harmful consequences for local communities. They institutionalize social practices designed by a small group of largely white, male, and American software engineers, undermining the self-determination of the societies they seek to expand into. And much like the colonizers of yore who tied all this to a so-called “civilizing” mission, they claim to do all this in the name of “progress,” “development,” “connecting people,” and “doing good.” +
What "biological sex" is is just trend lines. When people have x trait they tend to have y trait as well. But that is not a hard and fast rule, it is a TREND. When I put male or female on my medical charts, what is that supposed to tell my doctor? I have a vagina, but one altered by testosterone. I have ovaries, but they're inactive. I have the testosterone levels of a cis man. I have no idea what my chromosomes are. "Biological sex" here becomes completely arbitrary, and what I tell which doctor might differ on context and what medical task they're performing. You cannot know anything about someone based on what their "biological sex" is. We only have trends. And in the face of that, it becomes just about as arbitrary as gender
OMG can we please stop using Islamic concepts to criticize Christian theocrats in the States.
The US far right doesn’t want to establish a ‘Christian caliphate’, they’re not ‘Christian taliban’, and they’re not going to introduce ‘Christian shariah’.
Don’t use Islam to try to scare white people. Muslims are not the ones trying to dismantle our secular republic.
ok this is stolen directly from birdsite but i am also delighted. they should hand out these to everyone who is forklift certified https://twitter.com/acheyri/status/1645787480808116224?s=46&t=zk5VGdiXk1MkAodmYvtKsA
heard a weird sound. turned around. my supervisor is controlling a tiny RC forklift and placing a tiny pallet on a real pallet.
(the entire thread is also very good)
justice and injustice of language
“hermeneutical injustice” is a word i wish everyone knew and understood. it's like when you can't explain to someone how you are or what you need because you don't have good words for it. maybe you can't even understand yourself because you don't have the concepts. Even if you can explain it it takes so long and is confusing so it's unjust because most other people can explain themselves and understand themselves easier
Rust, copyright
The Rust Foundation is currently planning to set an extremely strict trademark policy, essentially prohibiting everyone for using the word “Rust” for the project names and domains (affecting project names like rust-crypto, names of YouTube tutorials about Rust) and also from modifying Rust logo (affecting e.g. Actix). They also managed to trademark the word Clippy, despite taking it from Microsoft.
They’re currently accepting community feedback. I think that proposed policy, if accepted, would greatly hurt Rust-related projects for no clear benefit. If you also have an opinion about that, please, give them your feedback.
https://nitter.cz/rust_foundation/status/1644132378858729474
UPD: I’ve been corrected: the current draft explicitly allows books, and I think allows websites as long as the domain name doesn’t contain the word “Rust”. The other interesting case is YouTube videos, since they’re commercial due to monetization.
self meta, fedi boundaries, about doom posting
I'm gonna start straight up blocking folks I see posting un-CW'd US doom politics all the time.
I get that shit is fucked over there (everywhere, really, we live in fucky times), but repeatedly posting takes about democrats vs republicans, Trump, US fascists, riling folks up to obtain guns... what does that really accomplish? Aside from making folks even more anxious, sad, and angry? Fuck all, I'd say.
On a more personal level, I just can't hack absorbing even more abstracted + formless anxiety and sadness than I already have about shit I actually have a say in. It's not good for me. If it helps people to post through it, fine, good for them (though I feel like it's less about venting and more about generating 'engagement'), but that doesn't mean I gotta see it too.
politics meta, hot take
instead of splitting politics into the arbitrary directions "left" and "right", which allows fash to claim their ideas are valid and so-called centrists that they are reasonable and everyone else is "too extreme in either direction", we should split them into the meanings of "does not want disadvantaged folks to suffer and/or die" and "wants disadvantaged folks to suffer and/or die"
this would solve a bunch of problems:
"leftists" that don't care about the poor, disabled, racially discriminated against, queer, and/or other minorities/marginalized would not longer be able to claim they're "also on the left so pwease do left unity uwu"
centrist positions would simply cease existing
it would be easier to discern bad faith actors from folks genuinely caring about issues
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.