Show newer

@zkat Ah, yeah, that matches what I've long been suspecting as well.

@zkat Would the 'malice' component then be something like "absorb all the community goodwill but keep the company just bad enough that it can't actually achieve its goals", or something else?

mozilla, browsers, actionable :boost_requested: 

@esoteric_programmer @serrebi @shine AccessKit did come up in one of the open issues regarding accessibility, but the provisional conclusion was that it would not (yet) have the necessary functionality to handle everything a browser needs

Like if Mozilla had spent half the money they basically set on fire by working on useless, unwanted shit all this time, they would have probably had enough resources to outcompete blink

Just so many failures that were clearly expensive, unlikely hail maries

Show thread

I can’t believe this company was once a place I seriously looked up to. They’ve been doing basically completely clown shoes shit back to back for at least the past decade.

Just absolute nonsense. It’s so bad I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s being intentionally sabotaged. The level of damage that has consistently been done to such a feel good brand, so consistently, for so long, almost feels like the sort of thing only malicious actors would pull off.

Show thread

@zkat (To clarify, all of my concerns were about the management layer. The people doing the work all seemed excellent and perfectly competent to me.)

@zkat I was invited to their Paris HQ about a decade ago for something only partially related to Mozilla (they were hosting a dev meeting), and got to talking with some of the folks there.

Everything I learned about how the place was run gave off a very strong "startup culture" impression to me, in the unsustainable "burning through money you don't have to keep up with the joneses" way.

Even then I couldn't shake off the feeling that they were headed for disaster and had absolutely no contingency plans or organizational survival skills if the funding were to even partially dry up.

All of which is to say, I don't know that it's sabotage. It seems explainable through culture issues alone... 😕

Mozilla have been up to a lot of clown shit lately, but slapping SaaS terms on a piece of software which is distributed to end users, with these kinds of overbearing and categorically inapproriate terms, has to be the clowniest. Fire these lawyers

Show thread

I just read an intended-to-be disparaging comment (not aimed at me) where someone said, "you're not a clown, you're the whole circus"

It took me several reads to process this as an insult.

If you use VS Code on , you may want to look at marketplace.visualstudio.com/i - it lets you run stuff like rust-analyzer and other plugin-internal processes in the context of a project's shell.nix, which is really useful when compilations require external system dependencies

the aliexpress algorithm has decided i’m the kind of person who’d buy a 1 ton mini excavator

they apparently are less than €2000

politiek 

@roelgrif En dat is natuurlijk totaal niet credible, maar dat verwacht de achterban dan ook niet...

politiek 

@roelgrif Ik zou daar nog niet zo zeker van zijn. Het lijkt erop dat dit bewust uitgelokt is om als pretext te dienen om alle steun aan Oekraine in te trekken.

Hottest Firefox Take Yet 

What if internet services were public utilities and what if that included my damn browser? Maybe I could just pay $10/mo for something way more stable and also way less caked with crap.

But I kid Capitalism and the tech bros, of course.

the real meaning of "cloud native" is "we're too preoccupied with 'scalable' design to notice that our cluster can serve requests at about the same pace as a 486 box running debian 2.0 in 1998 could, just more complicated and more difficult to iterate on"

USpol, Texas pol, anti-trans bill, caps. 

Once again, for those in the back. IT WAS NEVER ABOUT THE KIDS!!

Bill TX HB3399 is, essentially a find and replace, swapping out all instances of "child" or "minor" with "person" in the section of the health and safety code added by S.B. 14, the law passed in 2023 banning gender affirming care for minors.

This was *always* the plan. Anti-queer actions are *never* actually about protecting children.

Official bill here:
capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/

Text also visible, and the bill's progression is trackable here:
billtrack50.com/billdetail/184

everyone pls come check out my new youtube channel about racing games, I've been having a lot of fun with it and putting a lot of effort into it 🥺

youtube.com/@FlutterBugAuto

the youtuber thumbnail facial expression is to online video as the comedy and tragedy masks are to theater

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.