@riley Thanks!
@riley (Out of curiosity, what's that panel from?)
before my research I hadn't quite realised just how intertwined the discussion of intelligence is with our education system
like, sure, I knew that the education system was caught up in this idea of intelligence and that we can use testing to differentiate these levels of intelligence, but, I didn't realise that intelligence as a metric actually relied so much on performance in the school system too
and so, it's this endless impossible dance of intelligence researchers assuming that the education system is infallible, and education researchers assuming that the concept of intelligence is infallible, and both of them chasing the other concept which doesn't actually exist
like the original intelligence quotient, IQ, was actually this quotient between your "mental age" and your actual, physical age. how did they define mental age? well, of course, by how well you're doing in school, since school progresses at a rate of one mental year per physical year, obviously
like I'm actually disappointed at this point that modern intelligence research isn't just overt racism and instead this frustrating ouroboros that started with racism but ultimately forgot what it was chasing and is just chasing itself
TIL that people with disabilities that prevent them from using print books can get virtually any audiobook at no cost through the "Talking Books" program. I heard about it from a reference librarian with the Maine Digital Library, but it's a national US thing. And people with dyslexia are eligible.
#books #audiobooks #accessibility #dyslexia #libraries
@federicomena I've seen French (and only French!) code every now and then, but don't remember where, unfortunately...
The smartest ones arent touching the bubble. Ironically the second smartest ones are tacking it on completely reversibly and separately from whatever they had. Its the people that peg their imagination and make long term plans around the shit that are fucked for good in a way thats already written in stone but invisible from their perspective
The local language models are not an answer to the platform model, they're the suckers dose given to addict you to the pattern. The promise of free weights is a mirage. This is not a liberatory technology but instead of your pal that loves gambling and pepe memes holding the bag it will be your boss.
I don't normally ask for boosts, but I have just LEAPED out of my comfort zone and set up my own gamejam, specifically for users of the Fediverse, and I'm scared shitless that nobody else will join, turning this into one giant embarrassment for me.
So if you want to do me a giant favor, please boost (and even better: join!) this: https://mastodon.gamedev.place/@fedi_jam/113035512940511485 PLEASE! 🥺 🙏
Related- “Needle-free COVID-19 intranasal vaccine provides broad immunity, study finds” - https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-08-needle-free-covid-intranasal-vaccine.html
@cy I do wonder if the (appearance of) lock-in is specifically why Github has stuck with its PR-based contribution workflow, even though there seem to be extremely few projects on it for which it is actually working well
When I open a Reddit thread about "how do I create my own desktop environment" and all the comments from different people are some version of "don't, we already have too many of them", it makes the whole supposed promise of "fully modifiable, let a thousand options bloom" in Linux-land feel rather hollow.
Like, where's your enthusiasm? Your curiosity? Your pointers? Your constructive criticism?
activism(?) meta, "you", potentially hot take
@cy That is also okay! The important thing is just to be conscious of that, and to not do one thing and expect or communicate the other. 🙂 As long as you're not doing that, then the criticism wouldn't apply to you.
Something I still don't understand after all these years, is why all the conversation around #NixOS treats it as a "use it as-is" distro (which it really just isn't very good at!), and not more people are talking about what it could uniquely offer as a technical foundation for an actual end-user OS.
activism(?) meta, "you", potentially hot take (2)
It's interesting to see how this gets far less interaction than my critical posts usually get. I was kind of expecting that, though - as this is likely implicitly criticizing many of my followers, rather than some unspecified 'others', and so hits closer to home.
I do hope that people take this criticism to heart, even if they don't want to boost/favourite/reply to it.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.