Raspberry Pi Foundation [edit for some formatting and additional context]
Fediverse: There are no good companies on here.
RPi Foundation: *joins*
Fediverse: There is one good company on here.
RPi Foundation: *Hires cop whose job was surveillance, replies with snark when asked to consider at least how they made the announcement.*
Fediverse: There are no good companies on here.
@joepie91 Last year, I had a delivery notice sent to me on December 16 for something I should've received that day? That updated the delivery date to December 15.
Which was nice. We all needed a time machine.
@jordan Heh, nope, this was my meal kit delivery stuff. It won't really matter because I've blocked out delivery for that timespan anyway :p
@SkyFox Unspecified
Okay, but seriously
The idea that moderation should happen in the manner they suggest
1. If you *wanted* to make it impossible to defederate from a bad instance quickly, and you wanted to give them a chance to continue to abuse users, this is how to do it
2. Mandatory public receipts is a terrible idea if you care about user safety at all and will be weaponized
3. Voting about whether a thing is racist/sexist/homophobic aka having constant referenda about the value of these groups ![]()
re: qoto, bad instance
@eldaking @researchfairy That is 100% the intention of the name
qoto, bad instance
@researchfairy I wonder how anyone still federates with qoto. Between the block evasion scandal, the "freeze peach" commitment, the extremely suspicious exceptions in their rules, proudly saying they don't block any instances...
And now talking about how bad it is when others defederate. Like, is there anyone that can't see this is a server with extremely low standards, that is constantly being blocked by a lot of people?
For fuck's sake, just the name. "Question others to teach ourselves", it is clearly an instance _focused_ on sealioning.
re: fedi meta, UFoI, qoto
@david@tech.lgbt I've found this to be a good argument for that: https://old.mermaid.town/@triton/109474778261139113
Out of curiosity, which instance are you referring to with "one of their strongest supporters"?
tech bros will literally be like
my interests include
#ObjectOrientedProgramming
#SoftwareDevelopment
#BusinessToConsumerApps
why would you be so bland (yes these are all taken directly from a tech guy's bio)
re: meta / UFoI, slurs, antisemitism
@pinkprius@chaos.social Undoubtedly helped by the pretty clear vote manipulation on QOTO's side, there were some *extremely* suspicious voting patterns in there, like getting 19 downvotes within 11 minutes of posting a critical reply, while zero people actually replied to it
re: meta / UFoI, slurs, antisemitism
@sanctionedanya Oh, it 100% is that. Unfortunately the QOTO guy is very good at spinning official-sounding rhetoric that effectively catches the more, shall we say, politically oblivious
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.