Show newer

Research on Fedi 

Are you on an academic/scholarly/sciencey Fedi server?

Does your server have a policy regarding researching its users?

This is Scholar's, for example:

scholar.social/terms#research

We should be having this conversation about user consent, expectations and instance policies *now* before you end up having to explain why your cool cool paper about Fedi is getting retracted

Anyway

This sounds like snark but it's not

If you're on mastodon dot social or dot online

Leave that instance and get on a better one

They are de facto unmoderated instances due to their sheer size and many many instances have them limited

So for example, if someone from m dot s replies to this, I won't see it

Ever!

attention new peeps

welcome to mastodon, which is part of the wider fediverse

this place was built by marginalized communities coming together and deciding they were done with the bullshit on twitter

and trying to forge a more comfy space free from corporate influence

queers, furries, neurodivergent peeps, etc. built this place

we generally don't like cops, corps, landlords, and the like

i hope if it isn't immediately clear why, it becomes more so over time

and we hope you enjoy yourself!

Show thread

meta cw personal 

@scanlime On politics: I've noticed in my time here that I open almost every politics-related post that's CW'ed as such... but un-CW'ed politics posts consistently cause a stress response. That small courtesy make such a big difference.

I just want to make this one thing clear for all the new folks sending follow requests right now

There is no such thing as a good cop

Even if they're part of the absolute minority that joined the police force with good intentions, they still chose to become part of an institution with a long history racism, arbitrary violence against minorities, and an uncompromising agenda of suppressing the right of workers in favour of the interests of capital. Hanlon's Razor does not apply to the police

Policing does not reduce crime, social workers, decriminalisation of psychoactive substances, and a strong welfare state do

That's all for now, Souvka out

Fedi meta 

@rune Would probably save folks a lot of migrations if we just rebranded one of the right-winger instances to a cop instance, given the significant overlap

All the folks down at handwringing dot social and pearlclutchers dot online who left Scholar are gonna kick themselves when they find out that Scholar has a "no cops" policy that they didn't even have a meltdown over while they were here

Hey if you put together a space that is cop-friendly

You just built a queer-hostile space

meta 

@ajroach42 @nolan

where eternal september discourse is bad: elitism, snobbery, privilege, antidemocratic impulses.

where eternal september discourse identifies real problem moments even if it mislocates the causes: scale is poison.

there's good food for thought in both pieces, i think.

❌ we should have daylight when we go to work in the morning

❌ we should have daylight when we come home from work at night

☑️ we shouldn’t have to work so many hours that we have to ration The Sun

I love how I can zone out for a day and miss the creation and solution of a fediverse-wide problem

@ben @phoe The asshat in question seemed very surprised by the swift ejection from the community, too

Perhaps you are new to Mastodon and wondering, "what's wrong with choosing a huge instance like mastodon.social"? Have a peek at this for one good reason patreon.com/posts/74436103?pr=

"Home invasion: Mastodon's Eternal September begins" by @hugh hughrundle.net/home-invasion/

This past week has been wild. I have mixed feelings about it as well.

It’s interesting that the biggest communication challenge facing Mastodon communities is explaining that it’s basically a protocol and a network of independent, interconnected servers, which is what the Web, e-mail, even DNS and most of the fundamental services we use on the internet are, and always were.
It just illustrates just how much ‘Big Tech’ proprietary social media platforms swallowed up and walled off, if it’s now difficult to explain what the internet actually is!

Oh right I should re #introduce myself!

I'm Prism, and I'm a genderqueer dev working in VR. I'm also invisibly #disabled with #fibromyalgia . I will likely be posting #gamedev things, #knitting , and #cats , among other things I find funny. I also speak some #japanese and am looking to practice more!

Nice to meet you! Here's my cat tax payment. So hamsome

meta, colonialism 

@IgnisIncendio@tech.lgbt The idea of a "big tent" is basically the centrist concept that everybody must coexist in the same space and any concessions necessary for that should be made, because "why can't we all just work together and there will be no conflict"

The real-world effect of that, of course, is that marginalized folks are thrown under the bus, because they're the first "concessions" to be made

meta, colonialism 

@IgnisIncendio@tech.lgbt So... in principle, yes, that would be fine, and is indeed how things are designed to work.

The problem here arises because many of the newcomers are not just refusing to use CWs, but *also* complaining about getting instance-blocked. They seem to be of the belief that they should be allowed to push their content in the face of people who do not want it.

This is sometimes dressed up in language like "improving reach" or "staying in touch with other communities" or "big tent" or "healthy engagement", but it all ultimately boils down to the same thing: "you should have to receive the content that we push on our terms".

Likewise, many of these people aren't even thinking about "own instances" in the first place, but are of the (often unspoken) opinion that existing instances, particularly large ones, should accommodate what *they* want instead of what vulnerable people need, essentially forcing a cultural transition.

*If* newcomers accepted that instance bans are a normal part of how the network segments itself, and that they should set up their own instance if they disagree with the existing community norms, then all would be fine. But they just... don't. They try to force everybody else to change to their own personal demands instead.

Legal fund for Alex Norris, creator of Webcomic Name (the 'oh no' comics) 

A publishing company they partnered to make a board game with a few years ago has used the opportunity to take all of their intellectual property/claimed ownership of Webcomic Name as a whole :/
From what I read, seems like its not the first time this publishing company have done that either.
gofundme.com/f/alexnorrislegal

meta 

@jnonfiction Much appreciated, I wish more people approached it that way!

I'd recommend just hanging around for a while until the influx dies down, to get a first-hand impression of the general vibe and norms. There's only so much that can be explained in words, of course, and there's always a lot of nuance in a community-run place.

This may be helpful for the topic of CWs, at least: social.pixie.town/@joepie91/10

The most important thing, really, is to proactively keep an eye out for the needs of vulnerable folks on here, who have no other place to go. As long as you do that, things will work out fine, and people won't mind missteps :)

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.