health, positive, transplantation
Sodium levels have recovered to healthy levels, potassium levels are decreasing to healthy range (will arrive at healthy range in about 3 days at current diet). Provisional approval for transplantation from local kidney doctor!
Still needs to be confirmed by transplantation hospital but everything seems good 🙂
RMS (stallman)
@arisingvoice @tastytea@very.tastytea.de To clarify, my response was mainly to the parts that fall into the "toe nails/cheese" category.
The part that you're referring to is a lot more complex to address, because it's heavily reliant on context and intention (as you mentioned), and some part of the report is editorialization too.
Addressing this with sufficient nuance to not be misunderstood is something that requires more energy and spoons than I currently have available, and is somewhat of a moot point, because it's not really in question that RMS - who the report is ultimately about - is a harmful creep. So it's a topic I'd rather not go into in more detail right now.
Is there any Static Site Generator which will make pages based on SQL queries? I have a database with 70k rows, and I want to make a webpage for each one?
RMS (stallman), potentially uncomfortable discussion
@tastytea@very.tastytea.de I don't think the point of the website is to convince the defenders directly - rather it is to convince other community participants that those who defend Stallman must *knowingly* be doing so and so they are shitty people too.
That's a much easier argument to make when there's a comprehensive, almost overwhelming documentation of all the shitty stuff that RMS has done, because defenders can no longer plead ignorance or gaslight people into saying "nah that's just a rumour".
> we (free software enjoyers) should ask ourselves how to deal with people that still defend RMS instead of trying to convince the unconvincable.
So in short, I think this is exactly the thing that such a website helps with. It allows for cutting short the defenders' arguments as a third party, which makes it much easier to summarily remove them from a community as well.
I've been thinking a lot about what a friend pointed out - that mixed gendered spaces often quickly become male-exclusive because men tend to have much higher tolerance for arsehole behaviour than women, so it only takes one dodgy person to destroy a community as all the women basically leave. Once such a community has heavy male bias it can hardly recover, and its lack of representation means it can hardly succeed in any social, cultural or technical aims. Rings true for the extraordinarily bad gender balance in free/open source software in the context of the Stallman report.
RMS (stallman), potentially uncomfortable discussion
@tastytea@very.tastytea.de I think a big problem with the situation around RMS is that there's such a strong tendency in the community to wave away the serious accusations (which are not new!) as free-standing incidents or innocent mistakes.
In that context, I understand that someone got desperate and tried to come up with everything they could think of, in the hope that at least *something* would resonate with these people.
So I agree that a number of the things on the website are mild and/or strange and/or shitty things to make a problem out of, but in the specific context (and how long this shitshow has been going on for) I'm not sure that there would've been a better option to get through to people, and the whole thing feels like a choice of lesser evils to me 😕
The whole situation sucks, basically, and I'm not sure there was ever a 'clean' solution here.
@arianvp https://ublog.byme.at/objects/9a451291-7de4-45b8-8531-1d58b8755f1f provides some uh, clarification, as to what's going on
@red_sky I mean, I'm sure there are still some things with a custom protocol for some circumstances, but in practice everything (Matrix but also proprietary chat things) is addressable over HTTP now without weird reverse engineering nonsense like used to be necessary for stuff like the MDN protocol
advice, if wanted
@mynameistillian If there's one thing I've learned through many years of activism, it's pointless to "change someone's mind" on something... *unless* you are willing to make a significant commitment towards doing so.
If you only want relatively low-friction interactions (and this is a valid thing to want, if you're marginalized!), then it's best to focus on interacting with people who are on the fence but already predisposed to your views, and who really just need someone to talk it through with.
You *can* change the mind of people with even wildly different views, but it's a long-term commitment that requires specific strategies, a deep understanding of how their worldview works, and a lot of patience - often using unintuitive tactics. It's definitely not for everybody, and probably not the best use of your energy if you are already low on spoons.
And finally, don't underestimate the amount of change that can be caused by convincing people who are on the fence.
The section that describes "IQ stanzas" in the RFC immediately explains it in terms of "request/response" so it's not like those terms weren't already in use
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.