fedi meta, anarchism
I'm seeing the exact same failure mode happen with fedi that I've seen for a lot of 'anarchist' movements - they proclaim that "nobody is in charge", and then fail to identify that someone *is* in fact informally in charge (who shouldn't be) but they're just not taking responsibility.
Perhaps we should be making a point of saying "nobody SHOULD be in charge of fedi" instead of "nobody is in charge of fedi", to help people understand that "nobody is in charge" is a goal that needs to constantly be defended, rather than one that has been magically achieved?
Like, "nobody is in charge" *is* a good model to aim for, but it does require actual work to keep it that way because some people will try to take power by any means necessary, it's not something you just proclaim and then you're done.
@splatsune @vkc FWIW, Electron is entirely capable of doing multiple windows (with different content) in the same process, so this one is entirely on the application developers.
(Most likely the reason they don't do this is because they're trying to save a buck by reusing the same codebase for web and desktop, and in a browser you *can't* do this)
I just realized what I hate about modern chat: it's not a small window on the screen anymore, it's *the whole screen*.
Discord (et al) is barely usable in a small window, whereas AOL Instant Messenger was *very* usable in a small window as you went about your browsing.
For me, smaller window = fewer distractions.
You can't change these systems without explicitly dismantling white supremacy. That's something that White Americans don't want to contend with. Because so many other parts of life seem to magically bend around their wants and desires, they get confused about the parts that don't. This is a big problem for White liberals especially. They really thought they were fixing police brutality in 2020 by just exclaiming loudly that they wanted it to stop. But white supremacy is not under your control.
What I'm saying is that a lot of American Exceptionalism™ is based on sacrificing people. It is a very long tradition. And up until very recently, Black people were the default sacrifice. That was our explicit role in White American society. As soon as you understand that, a lot of American history starts to make way more sense.
And today starts to make more sense too. This is an America we're it's not so easy to designate groups for sacrifice. And we are finding it harder to get things done.
People like to think about racism as if it's full of malicious intent. But often it's much more banal. Most of the time it's nothing more than "if somebody has to get hurt, let it be them. Because who's gonna complain about that am I right?"
What's wild is once you actually start paying attention, you find out what we mean by "systemic". There's a story like this in every major city. Once somebody figured out this particular strategy of getting infrastructure built in a way that white constituents would accept, it spread all over.
We talk about how white supremacy requires a visible and identifiable underclass. Part of it is so that there is always a designated sacrifice so you can get what you want.
https://urbanists.social/@getalifemike/113052876190442664
@ktnjared @lina In a way, this doesn't feel surprising to me - the kernel development has long been affected by Torvalds' toxicity at the time, and so I would expect that to have selected for people who would at least tolerate and more likely share in such behaviour. Because other people would've bounced off.
Evenals vorig jaar vindt ook dit jaar weer een herdenking plaats van alle slachtoffers van dodelijk politiegeweld. De herdenking vindt plaats voor de deur van de Tweede Kamer in Den Haag, op 3 september, de eerste dag dat Kamerleden weer aan het werk gaan. https://www.doorbraak.eu/3-september-den-haag-herdenking-van-alle-slachtoffers-van-dodelijk-politiegeweld/
I remain constantly obsessed with the question of how we can all pivot away from modern capitalism and still be able to eat
I think the answers lie in looking at the structures and patterns of our economic lives, and tweaking those patterns to eliminate the extractionism and extractionists. I think this is totally doable — if people want to
this is because at like age 19 it struck me as really silly that an entire discipline would base all of its ideas on the foundational premise that every human in an economy is best defined as a ‘rational consumer’
I also was taking ‘history of consumer culture’ and learning about the rise of the advertising industry etc — lol no we are not rational consumers, we are insecure, chaotic mammals vulnerable to the powerful among us secretly deploying vast and extensive mind manipulation
re: meta, 'sub club'
@bananas It's not, which is exactly why I don't think any of the 'monetizers' would actually pass this test
@wyri @venite Kun je dan niet gewoon naar je begin- en eindstation kijken? Als er ergens daartussen gesplitst of gecombineerd wordt, dan zou er nog steeds een verschil zichtbaar moeten zijn (tenzij ze hetzelfde treinstel splitsen en dan weer combineren, maar ik kan me niet voorstellen waarom ze dat zouden doen).
Mask failure is always a nonzero risk, and this is one of the challenges of one-way masking, but there is an overlooked risk factor that many folks may not know about: alcohol vapor from hand sanitizer.
The charge of the electret material in N95s is highly durable and long-lasting, but vulnerable to degradation from alcohol vapor (the exact mechanism is unknown to me, but as the reference below notes, "alcohol vapor treatment is a standard method [...] to discharge electret filters and has been widely used in previous studies.) The overlap between folks who wear respirators and folks who use a lot of hand sanitizer is pretty large, and the degradation of an N95's filtration efficiency from alcohol vapor is measurable. If you can smell the vapor, then you are pulling it through the mask and exposing the fibers.
For single use -- and with masks that have multiple charged layers -- the concern is negligible, but the erosion becomes relevant depending on the mask & reuse.
Though fomites are a remote risk with SARSCoV2, they are a concern with other pathogens, and hypochlorous acid is a viable alternative.
Reference:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/gch2.202100015
meta, 'sub club'
Policy proposal: before you are even allowed to *talk* about 'monetizing' the fediverse, you must prove that you have a long track record of giving selflessly to mutual aid requests.
Because if you don't, then quite frankly I do not believe you that "funding the fediverse" is your true goal here.
I don't mind a good gripe. But I always cringe when people land on "why isn't this automatic". I think one of the reasons we can't have nice things is that everybody assumes human systems are easy and wondering why someone else isn't magically making it happen for them.
This shit is not magic. You just wanna take the work involved for granted. And it ends up making you sounding very different than the high horse you started out on.
https://todon.eu/@fenneladon/113051769907560593
equally sarcastic, re: meta
@pamela There's one major problem I see with that model - it doesn't have any spot in the middle where a techbro can sit inbetween interactions and skim a percentage off the top to get rich off other people's work! It's clearly not a true alternative to sub club.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.