Show newer

@jonny I'm certainly growing tired of the endless "experiments" with basic income that all show basically the same outcome, with those calling for them seemingly having no intention to ever do anything with it.

Like, it's a good thing by itself that some folks have been helped out of poverty, but as far as I can tell, these "experiments" are really just the government equivalent of 'concerntrolling' about how "we can't adopt an unproven policy like this, need experiments first" until people stop paying attention to the topic again.

LAPD's budget is $1.3 billion dollars, annually. For one year they moved $11 million of that (0.8%) to a basic income guarantee experiment that dramatically improved quality of life for 3600 people in LA by giving them $1000 a month. Like all basic income guarantee programs it is ending with no sign of sustained funding. LAPD's budget will increase by ~$75 million this year.

Every time.

static1.squarespace.com/static

latimes.com/california/story/2

advice (pt 2), re: sorta bad health news 

@mynameistillian Please let me know (DM or so) if that happens? We can probably figure out some way forward

advice (pt 2), re: sorta bad health news 

@mynameistillian I guess the bottom line is: you can't change the past anyway, you can only learn from it, so there's no purpose in getting angry at yourself over it, and learning from it is easiest when calm and doing it at your own pace

advice, re: sorta bad health news 

@mynameistillian Please keep in mind that a lot of these symptoms are 'generic' symptoms, in that they can occur for a lot of different things, ranging from "no big deal" to "serious issue" (and usually it's the former).

It's a good idea to get it tested, but I wouldn't worry unless there's concrete reason to do so (ie. actual data), because it's unlikely to be serious (and even if it is, a lot of things are very treatable).

When I got evaluated for my kidney issues, there was also briefly a suspicion of diabetes because of my symptoms + frequent co-occurrence with kidney issues, but it turned out to not be that at all.

(Also, with the kidney issues, I decided to just let things come at me and figure things out at my own speed, and this has helped *a lot* in dealing with it in the long term)

“Bent u bekend met ons concept?”

Wij hebben het full size gourmetten uitgevonden.

@xgranade@wandering.shop In another post, the Gravatar blog states that they want to be the 'single identity' for people on the web.

Absolutely the fuck not.

@jon ... this is a combination museum, burger restaurant, and tobacco shop?

OH: I wrote a wrapper shell script for rofi that checks if the exit code is the one for segfault, and if so, just runs it again

long, browser musings 

@freakazoid I intended to add it in the original post, but upon re-reading it just now realized that I forgot :)

long, browser musings 

@freakazoid Late addition: to clarify, I think it's actually a good thing when loopholes are used to fuck with and sabotage capitalists' plans, including copyleft - repurposing the system is a useful tactic!

My objection is specifically to relying on it as *the* solution in the long term (like people try to do with copyleft); legal loopholes will only ever work briefly at best, and they should be used as long as they work and then replaced with something new.

@mynameistillian Charities can get in the way of solving the problems they are designed to address, because their existance relies on it. That, and often because they're being funded to support industry. Medical charities can transfer money into medical services, Homeless charities can be used to pretend they are the solution to homelessness instead of addressing the housing market etc

that's not to say no charities do good things, of course. many do. it's just that capitalism co-opts kindness

One thing we're focusing on in our NSF POSE "ecosystem discovery" interviews is what makes someone trust a data source, and separately how they built trust with their own downstream users / audience.

Interestingly, a lot of folks recognize that they choose who & what data to trust largely based on institutional affiliation, but don't highlight that as a key to others trusting *them*

Confidence is not "I know what I'm doing."

Confidence is "I know how to find that out" and "I know how to learn new things" and most importantly "I know when I don't know what I'm doing, so I stop and find someone who does"

Obnoxious blowhards rely on people not understanding this distinction. And they amplify it by framing actual confidence as weakness.

This may be a useful thing to talk about with certain people in your life who are being fooled by fascists.

I suspect that a lot of white people in the fedi think if there were as much racism as Black folks are saying then they would see more of it. However, they're misunderstanding the nature of the racism. It's not casual, it's _targeted_. The racists go out of their way to find Black people and harass them.
Since it's targeted, people who aren't the targets see only a very small fraction of it.
Black folks aren't making shit up. Listen to them.
#racism

Capitalism's greatest trick was stealing so much of our time that we cannot imagine living without the 'conveniences' it sells back to us.

long, browser musings 

@freakazoid The answer to "why it isn't happening already" is actually pretty simple, IMO, and it is the same answer as for the rest of society: because kyriarchy is the norm.

This is true in FOSS circles too; FOSS absolutely is not progressive, despite the nominally ideological roots of it. There's no understanding of intersectionality, of the broader issues with kyriarchy, how non-tech politics relate to it... the vast majority of FOSS folks see it as 'just a technical choice' or at best a very restrictive notion of 'freedom', including in copyleft circles.

As for "what do we need to jumpstart it": create explicitly inclusive environments for developing projects. Rust has done this to some degree (but had the disadvantage of being the first really high-profile attempt to do so, and got a lot of abuse for it).

It needs to be clear *from the start* that marginalized perspectives are prioritized, that development choices center around people's diverse needs, and that the price of admission to the project is to accept those principles, and they are not negotiable.

Very few projects do this (Lix comes to mind as one of the few). Most projects are scared to take such a step, believing it will 'drive away contributors' (due to those same internalized toxic beliefs that marginalized folks cannot be competent and thus the privileged and bigoted folks are needed), and so instead adopt a much more superficial or pseudo-neutral stance, which doesn't address the problem. And that's how the problem perpetuates itself.

In summary: create an environment that is safe for marginalized folks (note: this requires having solid conflict resolution mechanisms, not just banning people!), and provide people with the resources they need to make things happen. That's probably going to include funding.

@smveerman Ah, I've used those with Beat Saber every once in a while; my limbs always feel weirdly lightweight afterwards, it's odd how quickly one's body adapts to such a weight change 😅

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.