Does anyone know a place in the Netherlands or Flanders that me, my partner, and cat can stay for a couple months from late april/early may as we try to get out of the kafkaesque bureaucratic nightmare we have found ourselves in? Limburg or nearby preferred but if it's like a house sitting thing we'd probably go anywhere
Please boost
@mattwilcox I would extend that even further: imagine if the total budget needed to get working self-driving cars, in its most optimistic estimate, had been spent on public transport.
We'd *still* end up with more value-for-money, even when it's up against actual working self-driving cars...
Imagine if all the collective money spent of “self driving cars” had been spent on public transport.
As in, not cars - which are ultimately bad solutions for most of the world - but punctual and pervasive clean-energy public trams, trains, and buses.
It’d have cost less and been far more useful for far more people. Including non-drivers. And actually be here. Today. Working.
Man. First review of my paper from last night contains *multiple* instances where the reviewer just says they are “tired” of the “here’s what we did” style of writing. No substantive issues identified.
I’m not going to stop writing these easy to read papers. Papers looking hard to satisfy some idiot whose grad students have been doing all their work for years isn’t a priority. If folks think a paper is too basic because of a genuine novelty concern, they can find substantive issues, but the fact that your work has to *look hard* is just such a fucking rebuke. No wonder everyone thinks CS is worthless.
Anyway, I am angry at this attitude. Not at any person, but the attitude at top venues that values hard looking work with irrelevant bullshit.
Back when my last student was graduating, they had killer results with one of their recent innovations. They wrote up the work. It was nice but boring. Then I told them to add a formalism. They argued, this is irrelevant, it adds little, it doesn’t guide our understanding. And yet, after adding the formalism the paper got rave reviews, because it *looked* like a contribution. But the formalism was something we hacked on at a whiteboard in three days, quite far away from the months of genuine innovation that it took to get to the real kernel of the idea…
Let the machines take over eh…
@NicoleCRust "Academic power structures as they currently stand are toxic - as evidenced by the outcomes" - Kay Tye
As relatively junior scientists, some of us have talked about academic toxicity in the past only to be harassed, silenced, ignored, or forced to leave. I'm glad that someone in a position of power acknowledged the toxicity. I hope that the toxic hierarchy collapses sooner than later.
Us choosing a cooperative form of governance at neuromatch.social, instead of a typical top-down hierarchy, is our attempt of trying a different power structure. I hope that we see more of such experiments permeate throughout academia.
@runevision ok so to tie this back a bit, my advice is if you're making a game and your game is not a AAA game, then simply avoid copying design formulae from AAA games, and then your game and its production will have a different set of problems than the ones AAA games often have.
@runevision A friend and former coworker of mine has a compelling theory that AAA teams build open world games like this because it allows for a lot of parallelism in their production, and the reason why it always feels like they filled the game with incoherent disconnected Content sprinkled around the map with a poisson distribution is because that's literally how their production was structured.
Pro tip: Every time you see the word “inflation” in the news, just replace it with “record-breaking corporate profits”. #CorporateGreed #notInflation
@hyphen don't forget the final paragraph
"Anyway, everyone should have access to good public transportation because freedom of movement is a human right and meeting a broad spectrum of humanity is good for your mental health and spiritual welfare."
@dthacker9 @rail_ This is both-sides-ism. We don't do that here.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.