re: sourcehut downtime
@jacksonchen666 The source repo for your uptime page is down :p
re: sourcehut downtime
@jacksonchen666 This feels ironic
@sieri@weirder.earth @hazelnot I was expecting to find a VLC joke here, and I wasn't disappointed
@Ninji That entire setup looks like it's seen better days
Hi fedi! @darius and I are digging into our governance research, and we have a great starter list of server admins to potentially talk to about governance and administration models and challenges, but *very unofficially*, I’d love to hear suggestions, too.
We’re looking at active servers ranging from ~100-2,500 users with some flex on either end of the range, and we’re building our list with an eye on structural, geographic, demographic (along multiple axes), and linguistic diversity.
re: constructive sabotage idea for anti-capitalists
@pinoaffe (Note that they usually won't *tell* you that someone else told them to; they will just insist that they need the feature and be incredibly vague as to why, or come up with an explanation/usecase that doesn't make sense)
re: constructive sabotage idea for anti-capitalists
@pinoaffe Ah, right - that's going to be dependent on the type of software, usually, but a good first pass is "hyperoptimize it for non-commercial use where no money changes hands"; like, deliberately build things without room for a billing mechanism or customer management, for example (eg. no ability to suspend an account for non-payment).
Another good one (though it requires more care to not introduce eg. unintended accessibility issues) is to design around a rigid way of using the system, especially around reporting.
Corporate users often need the software to work in very specific ways because "the manager said they want a report in such-and-such format" regardless of whether that actually makes sense, and every such reported issue that you can answer with "we have no intention of supporting this, _____ should be good enough" is a win.
It does take some experience, but after a while you'll learn to spot the complaints and feature requests that are obviously for corporate use, vs. those of individuals or collectives. "Needs a feature or change because someone else told them to, rather than because it solves a clear problem" is the major red flag.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.