Posted this to Twitter today.
You know, human beings really are creatures of habit.
We will put up with so much as long as it comes with a little gratification and validation. Even when the good parts are outweighed by the bad.
Some of the same people who moaned about how "annoying" Mastodon is, are the same who moan about Twitter's many issues.
I'd rather experience some growing pains than slow poisoning.
Thank you to everyone who was willing to make a new start here.
"You can't recycle your way out of climate change. You can't shop your way out of monopoly. Systemic problems need systemic solutions.
What the individual can do is think of themself as part of a movement. If you join a movement, then you and the people with you can make change. But not you on your own."
—Cory Doctorow @pluralistic
talking with other leftist coalitions in the area and the way they think about burnout is like this inevitable contagion that just happens when you're leftist enough but like
IDK, is it burnout you're feeling or is it being normal tired from doing regular work, or do people feel aimless and are disillusioned with a nebulous goal, or are beaten down by project failure, or see no example to strive for, or feel no connection and community with the group, or etc etc etc
I feel like there's this tendency towards blaming org issues on burnout because it individualizes the problem, but it's exactly that tendency towards individualizing issues that we're actively fighting as leftists
grumbling, activism
If you feel that radical folks are "too radical" and "scaring off others", but "you agree with them in principle", why aren't you volunteering to do the job of explaining this to liberals/centrists/etc.?
Why are you instead demanding that the radical folks moderate their speech, look friendly, and generally shut up about the incredibly taxing and frustrating experience of constantly getting the same milquetoast subtly-bigoted shit thrown at them masquerading as progressive politics?
Why are you expecting the people who are *already* bearing the brunt of abuse and doing most of the work for social change, to do *even more* work to look less scary and more appealing? Why aren't *you* the one doing that?
@ajroach42 I've been very happy with my Brother DCP-L8410CDW, though it is not cheap (but it's worked 100% reliably and also works with IPP Everywhere under Linux). It also does duplex printing. This was pretty much my attempt at buying my way out of printer misery, and successfully so.
From what I can *tell*, the toner cartridges do not appear to have any chips - I've just removed one, and I can't find any electronic contact points at all, though I may of course have missed something.
The significant price difference between first-party and third-party toners for this model, though, suggests that they are indeed unchipped and don't require "remanufacturing".
It’s ok if your life doesn’t look like those of other nonbinary people.
You aren’t “behind” compared to them. You aren’t an embarrassment if your needs and wants are different.
Nonbinary people are defined in part by how we can’t fit in with many people.
You standing out a little more is perfectly fine.
This is a long read, but it's also entirely necessary: https://immerautonom.noblogs.org/the-elephant-in-the-room/
[From the content warnings at the top: sexual violence, sexual coercion, child sexual assault, rape apologia, pedophilia]
It starts off discussing Andrew Lloyd's recently outed actions (as "Anarqxista Goldman") and continues delving into how the kind of "theory" he wrote and published permeate through anarchist spaces because of the lack of interaction with or curiosity about anarcha-feminism, queer anarchism, and genuine youth liberation (to name a few).
@samgai (A lot of these keyboards rely on "well you can map a second layer to have the F keys there", a bit like how Fn keys work, but that's frankly a pain to work with)
@samgai The F-keys themselves? They don't go anywhere, you just don't have them at all. The remaining keys like Esc generally get relocated elsewhere in the layout.
@samgai Yep, unfortunately almost every mechanical split keyboard goes completely overboard on the "eliminating keys/space" part, and eliminates the entire F-key row.
There's like 5 models in existence *in the world* that I know of, that tick all the boxes of "split, mechanical, and with an F-key row".
re: One-liner percentage
@eons Ah, someone has been digging in the DigiD source? :p
@eloy Not exactly; necrocomputing is like the regressive little brother of retrocomputing. Where it's not just about enjoying tinkering with old technology or experiencing nostalgia (both of which are fine!), but the old technology is presented through some rose-tinted glasses as if it is superior *today*.
It's often identifiable by people lamenting modern safety or reliability features, tending to call everything "bloat" if it's newer than 30 years old, and constantly talking about old tech in a "good old times before everything started sucking" tone, with no recognition whatsoever of the advances in modern technology.
It's not a coincidence that their narratives often look an awful lot like the "good old times, when men were men and we walked uphill to school both ways" sentiments - the mechanics and beliefs behind it are very similar, and it's often the same people saying it.
(This is distinct, of course, from people talking about old vs. new tech in a more balanced manner, where they recognize both the things that have improved and the things that have gotten worse over time.)
So this is probably the most important thing I've learned about dealing with marginalized topics: talk *with* marginalized folks, don't talk *over* them.
If you're cis, don't "debate" with another cis person about trans legislation. If you're white, don't "debate" with another white person about whether Black folks experience racism.
Instead, learn from marginalized folks themselves. They're living and breathing creatures, not abstract debate topics.
But don't demand that they educate *you, personally* either (unless you're paying them for it). Start by reading things that have already been written from a marginalized perspective, it's not exactly hard to find with your search engine of choice.
(And if this makes you go "wait, but what's wrong with debating over people, isn't that just how political debate and podcasts work?": you've just discovered why those things are harmful)
re: twitter
@blackbuddy@chaos.social Entirely serious https://bid.hgpauction.com/auctions/8421/herita10194
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.