Question for #Wikipedia nerds: I've found an article on Wikipedia about a techbro that very much reads like it's written by the dude himself to advertise him personally - I've already removed the in-body external link to his company, but the rest of the article still reads like a puff piece and conveniently omits any negative press coverage.
Where/how do I report this as something that needs to be looked at? I do not currently have the spoons to fix it myself.
@Gaelan Thanks. Looking at those pages, I get a pretty strong impression of "don't tag things unless you're willing to commit to following up", unfortunately, which I can't do (because spoons), so I guess I won't be reporting the issue...
For what it's worth, the article in question is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lukas_Biewald which seems to be autobiographical, going off about his company (which the article is not actually supposed to be about), *and* leaves out stuff like his being featured (negatively) in the Ghost Workers documentary about labour exploitation.
@Gaelan (Tangential follow-up on this: https://social.pixie.town/@joepie91/112773573932929589)
@joepie91 yikes!