Question for #Wikipedia nerds: I've found an article on Wikipedia about a techbro that very much reads like it's written by the dude himself to advertise him personally - I've already removed the in-body external link to his company, but the rest of the article still reads like a puff piece and conveniently omits any negative press coverage.
Where/how do I report this as something that needs to be looked at? I do not currently have the spoons to fix it myself.
@Gaelan Thanks. Looking at those pages, I get a pretty strong impression of "don't tag things unless you're willing to commit to following up", unfortunately, which I can't do (because spoons), so I guess I won't be reporting the issue...
For what it's worth, the article in question is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lukas_Biewald which seems to be autobiographical, going off about his company (which the article is not actually supposed to be about), *and* leaves out stuff like his being featured (negatively) in the Ghost Workers documentary about labour exploitation.
@joepie91 @Gaelan I would ignore that
If you can fix the issue yourself, you don't need to add the banner anyway
if you can't fix it but can diagnose the issue, you need some way to signal it to other editors. That's were the banners are for.
I sometimes see banners that have been there since 2007, strong Mozilla bugtracker energy
@Gaelan (Tangential follow-up on this: https://social.pixie.town/@joepie91/112773573932929589)