grapheneos
"You attacked us [by criticizing us publicly] so now we're pausing all work on accessibility" sure is a stance to take, hey
grapheneos (2)
Anyone else getting "looking for an excuse to stop doing it" impressions from this?
grapheneos (3)
Like, don't get me wrong, I certainly understand the frustration of being criticized for (often unpaid) work, particularly if the criticisms are inaccurate in some way.
But when you're writing lengthy and loud posts about how you've been "attacked" and "harmed" and "misrepresented" and whatnot, but none of those posts ever actually make a concrete point about *what* exactly is being misrepresented, then I suspect there's something else going on.
grapheneos (4)
And it's not like the claim here is vague or in dispute either. It essentially boils down to "GrapheneOS could include espeak, but doesn't, because of the license". That claim is *directly* confirmed by the linked post from the project, which states as much.
So where is the misrepresentation, exactly?
