about those government petitions
Those "hit X signatures and the government will consider your request" petitions irritate me to no end. Not because of the people sharing them, but because their institution is such a farce of 'democracy'.
Like, the appeal is clear. "You can influence government policy, just sign these petitions!", and that makes them an appealing tool for governments to use to give citizens the impression that they're participating. But no, you're really not.
Here's the fundamental problem with them: the amounts of signatures that these things require are very high, and the counterpart obligations on the government are extremely low. Generally they require nothing more than 'consideration' or a vote, as they are entirely non-binding in terms of policy.
The result is that, as a petition organizer, you basically always have to spend orders of magnitude more effort getting your petition 'through', than it costs politicians to dismiss it if it doesn't fit into their plans.
That is not democracy. That is not influence. That's a way to suppress citizen participation by exhausting organizers, and nothing more.
I don't have a problem with people choosing to create such petitions, or campaigning for them. But I do have a very big problem with the governments who basically declare that we'll get these fucking crumbs of influence and we shall be happy with them.
No. Fuck that. It's *our* world. Governments do not get to define the ways in which we are allowed to govern ourselves.
about those government petitions
@joepie91 it shows heavy similarities with the imbalance between the effort required to spread disinformation and the effort required to correct it. Despite everything, I still support these petitions if it's something worthwhile. And with that I mean concrete policy suggestions, not the "X resign" or "Disband Parliament and hold new elections" because despite me hating said politicians and governments, disregarding the democratic institutions and regulations just makes it easier for people to further erode protections and take steps towards authoritarianism. If you want change, vote at the ballot box. Sure, protest, but unless your voting system has a 'recall petition' options, collecting signatures to send home MPs is not the way