Is Linux As Good As We Think It Is?
@SnotFlickerman @wuphysics87 I think this is getting two things mixed up, honestly. It is true that many systems do not recognize people's agency, and force new things on them that are unwanted. But that is not the same thing as "just works"!
When people ask for something that "just works", usually what they are asking for is a reasonable and accessible baseline experience, reliable feedback that tells them what to do next if something goes wrong, and an overall predictable system that is difficult to break beyond one's own ability to fix it.
None of these require disrespecting people's agency to fulfill, and all of them are points that every Linux distro I've ever seen scores poorly on. Some distros barely meet the bar of "baseline reasonable experience", only to immediately fall apart and require complex interactions to fix as soon as anything breaks.
Does this mean that Linux needs to be restricted to a single set of mandated usage and design like Windows (and, recently, GNOME) have been chasing? No. But there is absolutely a lot of room for improvement in the general reliability and accessibility of Linux systems, without compromising the customisability and agency that a Linux system typically provides.