(This is strongly reminding me of the zeal with which people defended the Chromium sandbox as a replacement for memory safety, even in the face of significant evidence against their security strategy)
@joepie91 *looks at the recent departure of Rust-in-linux dev due to C devs being shitty about rust*
ah, yes, I see nothing has changed
(If you're not familiar with the history of this, try looking up their old "why no Rust in Chromium" docs page in the Wayback Machine, which said something to the effect of "Rust is too difficult to integrate, and we don't need memory safety anyway, we can do it safely with C++")