@isotopp @vladh I have mixed feelings about this. In a strictly technical sense, you are correct, but that's not the only sense that matters here.

Activism isn't really interchangeable; different people can do different things, and crucially *can't* do some things. For example, some of those who might be able to improve energy use of software, may not be able to engage in politics in a meaningful way.

Is it then better if they do nothing at all?

I feel like it ultimately comes down to what the choice is between; if it is between large systemic change and small changes like this, the former is obviously the better option. But if it's between this or nothing... well. Better this than nothing.

So personally I don't see a problem with smaller efforts towards change like this, *as long as* it is explicitly acknowledged that it is only a small first step, and those involved are encouraged to get involved in bigger efforts (like systemic politics) when they are able to. Diversity of tactics and all that.