threads
Threads defederating from pretty much all of queer fedi because it "violates their community guidelines" but only having "privacy policy" as the reason for defederation from gleasonator (with no mention of community norms) kind of illustrates what's going on there, doesn't it
re: threads
@kescher Oh sure. It's still darkly hilarious that Threads now probably has one of the longest defederation lists of the whole Fediverse, weird techbros complaining about defederation being 'exclusion' notwithstanding
threads
@joepie91 im more surprised there are queer fedi instances that were federating with threads than them being defederated from threads side tbh but also
that sure sounds correct
threads
@aimlessComposer I have no idea whether they actually were federating, to be honest. It's very possible that someone at Facebook just went through every instance they could find to judge its suitability, with no regard for federation status. That approach would make more sense in a corporate context than a reactive defederation approach.
threads
@joepie91 actually that's super true and makes sense now that I think about it.
still absolutely wild at the end of the day
re: threads
@joepie91 hey i mean we didn't want them anyway did we