@noracodes hm, feels wrong to argue that it is not your supply chain because it is the commons. I think it *is* your supply chain as a company, just not one you are financially invested in (the better ones are)
Follow
@eloy @noracodes In commercial circles, "supply chain" is often taken to imply an obligation on the part of the supplier to continue providing services reliably, and I suspect that that's the rationale behind this post
@joepie91 @eloy @noracodes I suspect this concept is more born out of the proprietary world where you are literally dependent on your vendors, because you're SOL without their continuous support. Hence why that's a sucky model.
@eloy @noracodes (More generally, the perspective of a company is not going to be one of responsibility, like in your post, but one of entitlement or exploitation - which is why "supply chain" to them means "what do we get out of it", and not "what responsibilities do we have here")