@Polychrome The problem is that you're trying to make a wise-ass comment implying "oh, it's not that bad" when the practical reality is that a lot of people will suddenly be without their accessibility aids that they have come to depend on.

It *is* that bad. Most people do not have the time and/or ability to just casually develop an abuse-resistant decentralized system. *Especially* disabled folks who are relying on these sorts of aids to participate in society, and often already have less energy to spend.

You need to think about comments like these more carefully before making them, and ask yourself "will this comment actually help people"? And if you're suggesting that "oh, it's not that bad, because an alternative could theoretically exist but doesn't", then the answer to that is pretty clearly "no".

If you want to actually *work on* building that alternative, that's fine. Ask for people to join in the effort, that's fine.

But just throwing out a comment about a hypothetical that you're never planning to make happen isn't useful to anyone, and doesn't serve anyone except to reinforce your own sense of superiority for not needing to rely on these services. Which is, by the way, ableist.