fedi admin meta
I think that the rectification regarding AnarchoNina was too late, and that not enough due diligence was done in this case before publishing the block recommendation. From what I can see, this could have been avoided with more care.
At the same time, if you take this as proof that block recommendations need to follow nation state levels of evidence... wow, you do not understand how this works.
A singular error in judgment does not invalidate a moderation model, and it seems to conveniently disregard that court-level evidence standards have *huge* and well-known issues around dealing with abuse in particular.
This isn't your smoking gun.
re: fedi admin meta
To pre-empt the "but what would convince you that this model of moderation is bad" question: if someone can credibly argue that the total failures of this model are, on the whole, *worse* than those of a court-level evidence approach
