Actually, thinking about it more, I might as well repost this publicly...
Is it just me, or does that Veilid project smell a bit weird?
Like, the involvement of someone from hackers.town, the "source drop" release strategy without initial development in the open, the seemingly intense marketing, the apparent lack of a coherent document explaining the architecture/design, while at the same time heavily focusing on the technical side with not a word on the topic of abuse management...
Any of these individually wouldn't necessarily be an issue, but altogether it smells a bit... sus to me
@retr0id That's kind of plausible, but it's also something that could be addressed by just telling cryptobunk grifters to fuck off when they show up.
Keeping the entire thing private also has the effect of excluding broader marginalized groups from the process...
