@_sivizius @nikodemus @Larymir Make sure to use a (varied) combination of punctuation - dashes, semicolons, parens - to indicate the bonus content; otherwise it becomes so monotonic
@ytvwld @joepie91 @nikodemus @Larymir Footnotes are overrated.¹
1: You should rather cite some literature.[23]
== Literature ==
…
[23] Doug Zongker,
Chicken chicken chicken: Chicken chicken, Annals of Improbable Research 12 (5): 16–21 (2006).
@joepie91 @nikodemus @Larymir End your thoughts with a period. But not the final one, because this would close an open mind
@joepie91 @_sivizius @nikodemus @Larymir this is the way
@joepie91 @_sivizius @nikodemus @Larymir footnotes!