@nu And honestly, most of those things, US residents can't take action on either. Something shitty happening in a different county or state from where you live? Tough shit.
re: rambling, kind of politics
@loren @artcollisions @nu I feel like this is the same sort of thing as the "news" vs. "journalism" distinction.
News: reporting of a thing that is currently or has recently happened. Not contextualized, not actionable. Basically useless, just sensationalist and anxiety-inducing. It sells newspapers, pretty much.
Journalism: investigating and explaining some sort of long-term trend or phenomenon, drawing from many different events and contextualizing them into a bigger narrative. Often actionable, low on sensationalism, and not necessarily related to any very recent event.
I kind of apply this same principle to 'global thinking' around activism; there is not really any value in me being aware of every little thing that has happened anywhere around the world, because it is not actionable.
It *is* useful, however, to understand the shared problems and long-term patterns that exist in many places, and how they come into existence and can be fought. That is much less anxiety-inducing, and provides a concrete starting point for understanding how to apply it locally, even if the events don't look the exact same.
I guess this is probably where the phrase "think global, act local" comes from, too.
(In the same vein, I would love for people to toot less about the crisis-of-the-day, and more about their ideas and/or projects for addressing long-term concerns...)